From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LYf1B-0008H5-Uz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:18:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0F0FE0462; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.10]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96B8E0462 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B781DEBBF for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:18:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([192.168.54.25]) by localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GJX1nY1MH2zR for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:44:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wstn.ethnet (unknown [78.32.181.186]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60EDADEBA9 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:18:37 +0000 (GMT) From: Peter Humphrey Organization: at home To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] a multi-process browser? Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:16:33 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <4997B5BC.1020604@realss.com> <20090215131428.139a0e91@coercion> In-Reply-To: <20090215131428.139a0e91@coercion> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902151116.33650.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> X-Archives-Salt: 4e5a04d9-257c-47d0-8d08-9b3fb59cb8f6 X-Archives-Hash: 523e8fd3c7f5fbcf0ff286835cec56fc On Sunday 15 February 2009 08:14:28 Mike Kazantsev wrote: > On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:27:08 +0800 > > zhangweiwu@realss.com wrote: > > I don't know if in China network is specially boardband otherwise how > > to explain the forums dare to allow dozens of hi-res photo posted > > in-line of messages and web designers dare to design websites with a > > front page of more than 3MB (e.g. our local tax office website contain > > huge picture and flash on the front-page with several hundreds of links > > on it). > > You can use on-demand loading for such content with firefox plugins > like flashblock - it'll load flash only when you click on it. I bet > there are plenty such plugins for images, as well. I'll put a word in here for the NoScript and AdBlock extensions to Firefox. I'd imagine those are more-or-less essential in China - I certainly wouldn't like to be without them even here in UK. -- Rgds Peter