From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LXfSP-0002JP-UY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:34:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF9B9E04C7; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A914E04C7 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krikkit (krikkit.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3CE046FAFF for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:34:34 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:34:24 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] python-2.5.2-r7 build problems Message-ID: <20090212173424.663d2725@krikkit> In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0902120620h76abf977if9eaf508905dd06@mail.gmail.com> References: <5bdc1c8b0902111758n4f7b1bbw97e03dc5c093d85f@mail.gmail.com> <499388B5.80105@gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b0902111840j275fdd8eg429460bb979a2b08@mail.gmail.com> <499391BC.2080001@gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b0902112022o5324120ax47a8eabb8da344c5@mail.gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b0902112022x7f368b19i2a7eee108df2af95@mail.gmail.com> <20090212085859.73ff966e@krikkit> <5bdc1c8b0902120620h76abf977if9eaf508905dd06@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0cvs59 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/WDK0IrQ9De=fLOt71Sd98Lw"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: d4d5b5d7-701b-43f9-8d1d-a5070fb0e58b X-Archives-Hash: 05a5f9cbabc82ddfbd58a6920b69ba65 --Sig_/WDK0IrQ9De=fLOt71Sd98Lw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 06:20:28 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: > > You have more aggressive flags on the failing machine, have you tried > > using the more conservative (less ricey) flags? > I have not and intend to do that today. The flags have been set like > this since 2003 so I'm surprised that it might be something like this > but it's clearly possible. >=20 > I'm unqualified to say what part of the differences is making this set > more aggressive. Line by line what's your opinion? >=20 > -O3 vs -O2 ? Not much difference. > -march=3Dathlon-xp vs -march=3Di686 The former is better, providing you're using an AthlonXP. > -funroll-loops You only have to look at http://funroll-loops.org/ to know this is a bad option... > not using -fomit-frame-pointer That's pretty safe, the frame-pointer isn't much use anyway if you're compiling without debug symbols, which most build do by default. > Strange taht after 6-years this would come up but stranger thing happen. Indeed. --=20 Neil Bothwick Obscenity is the crutch of inarticulate motherfuckers. --Sig_/WDK0IrQ9De=fLOt71Sd98Lw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmUXakACgkQum4al0N1GQPOsQCg2g97FhCssjnYpUUqOUOqzlLE OioAnjbnwUl+Q6+taddFsabOaUWOjito =UG7O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/WDK0IrQ9De=fLOt71Sd98Lw--