public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] python-2.5.2-r7 build problems
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:34:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090212173424.663d2725@krikkit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0902120620h76abf977if9eaf508905dd06@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1090 bytes --]

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 06:20:28 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:

> > You have more aggressive flags on the failing machine, have you tried
> > using the more conservative (less ricey) flags?

> I have not and intend to do that today. The flags have been set like
> this since 2003 so I'm surprised that it might be something like this
> but it's clearly possible.
> 
> I'm unqualified to say what part of the differences is making this set
> more aggressive. Line by line what's your opinion?
> 
> -O3 vs -O2 ?

Not much difference.

> -march=athlon-xp vs -march=i686

The former is better, providing you're using an AthlonXP.

> -funroll-loops

You only have to look at http://funroll-loops.org/ to know this is a bad
option...

> not using -fomit-frame-pointer

That's pretty safe, the frame-pointer isn't much use anyway if you're
compiling without debug symbols, which most build do by default.

> Strange taht after 6-years this would come up but stranger thing happen.

Indeed.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Obscenity is the crutch of inarticulate motherfuckers.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-12 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-12  1:58 [gentoo-user] python-2.5.2-r7 build problems Mark Knecht
2009-02-12  2:25 ` Joshua D Doll
2009-02-12  2:40   ` Mark Knecht
2009-02-12  3:04     ` Joshua D Doll
2009-02-12  4:18       ` Mark Knecht
2009-02-12  4:22       ` Mark Knecht
2009-02-12  4:22         ` Mark Knecht
2009-02-12  8:58           ` Neil Bothwick
2009-02-12 14:20             ` Mark Knecht
2009-02-12 14:52               ` Mark Knecht
2009-02-12 17:34               ` Neil Bothwick [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090212173424.663d2725@krikkit \
    --to=neil@digimed.co.uk \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox