From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LUmMO-0006iz-QM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:20:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FA14E01DB; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:17:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B82E0314 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:17:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rohan.altum.de (achn-4db4b0d3.pool.einsundeins.de [77.180.176.211]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu8) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML31I-1LUmJi0Ivu-0002uT; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:17:42 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rohan.altum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B036870055F for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:17:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from gondolin.localnet (gondolin.altum.de [192.168.2.4]) (Authenticated sender: heini) by rohan.altum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D61B4700556 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:17:39 +0100 (CET) From: Dirk Heinrichs Organization: Privat To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: libtool problem Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:17:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.28.3; KDE/4.2.0; i686; ; ) References: <20090203153607.7396de6b@krikkit> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1788324.KplgOaou8d"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200902041917.38293.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/9p86Af1SmT1ipTzwdmrRk8ZmHI4cBjH+8nhZ T5QOsdo1bswN0+UbMfNHaqINS71uin0b49DeYWex0vmAzrtAUE bMXf80inI7PQzYZMiE6EQ== X-Archives-Salt: 8fb32577-03ed-45d5-bee0-3fd17c8787fb X-Archives-Hash: 8581a0055dc23223917b38449fc185d2 --nextPart1788324.KplgOaou8d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Mittwoch, 4. Februar 2009 04:25:34 schrieb ABCD: > The reason there wasn't a bump (IIRC) was that the ebuild never changed > - only the eclass did. =A0If you emerged any version of GCC during the > window where the eclass was broken, that version of GCC would have been > broken. That also means that portage is broken. Whenever something changes where ot= her=20 things depend on, those other things should be rebuilt. This doesn't happen= =20 here. Bye... Dirk --nextPart1788324.KplgOaou8d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBJidvC8NVtnsLkZ7sRAivBAJ9gZmTRPuDG2c6W0uTzIbR/zZ/V0gCggdXp JLffeRw8xpS8k8Ty1NbWdgw= =FKhY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1788324.KplgOaou8d--