From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LUh1K-0000hx-Pg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:38:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52D17E0432; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC929E0432 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:38:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so1315352fga.14 for ; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 04:38:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-homepage:x-operating-system :user-agent; bh=cTolyBf/JCpQECnwQejR0Wbu6NQmBFUQJtExIoye7E0=; b=dQK+rMgVcL+SjtoF5eO1eObTmHd5uScHwur13315HRWZusifunegJ7Eu1QBY7iaWib hMyFeqf4IOS7QyziRHKooBU8kzVIWttXz+n6WzHN2CChVSZLf5T2a2aXICaXwJkzHtVR BVS4KijNr09OUQrbOFMdRKWiSN9EJBb60KRs4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :x-homepage:x-operating-system:user-agent; b=bkah5g5wGDz8SX1ocqHJhwvfXIYaQ45sp+jibnCHKki0WTEUgOWTXiZT01+d8ZYXhs DehCO8SNbO0fZpG9tJzJYRNI44yAD95Fcza5Rm5ac3tJ6E/t/LJpWPWKMWMkuLoIGJTG Bt1N/7q5y/MBzigFou7oyE0Dojk+mZtCG158M= Received: by 10.86.51.2 with SMTP id y2mr1816329fgy.33.1233751100370; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 04:38:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([151.81.7.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 12sm6671460fgg.33.2009.02.04.04.38.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 04 Feb 2009 04:38:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:35:29 +0100 From: Momesso Andrea To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Different servers behind the same router Message-ID: <20090204123529.GA22980@revolver> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <20090203174321.GA30119@revolver> <20090203183516.GA30510@revolver> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Homepage: http://topperh.blogspot.com X-Operating-System: Gentoo Linux User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: 25bb79a9-3ee4-494d-9aff-9253c2e72a6b X-Archives-Hash: c3746a93e07750a3ceb112a1fdc6e8ae --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 01:36:55AM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > Momesso Andrea wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 05:52:13PM +0000, Stroller wrote: >>> On 3 Feb 2009, at 17:43, Momesso Andrea wrote: >>>> ... >>>> What happens if I decide to switch to the "router" configuration? If I >>>> have a single IP for all the machines in the LAN, when someone from the >>>> outside will try to connect to homeserver.foo or to webserver.bar, will >>>> they be routed to the correct machine? >>> No, they will all reach the router's IP address. It will have an option= =20 >>> for "port forwarding" so that you can forward port 80 to the webserver= =20 >>> and ports 25 & 110 to the mail server. If you have two webservers behin= d=20 >>> the router then you need to use one to proxy forward to the other. >>> >>> "NAT" is another Google keyword. >>> >>> Stroller. >> Is it correct to say that the configuration I alredy have (pppoe and=20 >> different IPs) is the best choice? > > Since your ISP offers you the option to have two different IP, yes that t= he=20 > best choice. Over here I would have to pay quite some money to get an=20 > extra IP. So you're lucky I guess. > > Also, if your ISP allows PPPoA too instead of only PPPoE, use that instea= d.=20 > It's a bit more optimal due to less overhead. But it's not critical or= =20 > something. Just a little and safe optimization. > Looks like my ISP allows both PPPoE and PPPoA.=20 After some superficial googling it looks like PPPoE is preferred over ethernet modems and PPPoA over USB ones... Is it true? By the way what I need to do is to enable CONFIG_ATM and CONFIG_PPPOATM in the kernel and reemerge ppp with the "atm" USE flag. Then I need to change " plugins_ppp1=3D( "pppoe") " into " plugins_ppp1=3D(= =20 "pppoa vc-encaps") " in my /etc/conf.d/net. Is that all I need to have PPPoA working? =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D TopperH =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmJi5EACgkQTusdC+HYtiJe/gCcCfdRCu3wGTf1AmGWi2eR4OW/ 1xMAoLkbN/eK5WKnEcm1aCDZ7B3ANBxL =0L1f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--