From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LUeOi-0001fN-EC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:50:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26DE6E0227; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9030E0227 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krikkit (krikkit.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29B14368B59 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:50:18 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:50:10 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: libtool problem Message-ID: <20090204095010.2b8de9f4@krikkit> In-Reply-To: References: <20090203131248.5f1b6210@krikkit> <20090203202317.09b67581@coercion> <20090203153607.7396de6b@krikkit> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0cvs53 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/5cjBeBYI43G=xXQ.Az_Hxrw"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 8d8ff63a-b9fa-4452-8506-944712817e9f X-Archives-Hash: 04a8fb72aabc65ef68e57e58b30e5c84 --Sig_/5cjBeBYI43G=xXQ.Az_Hxrw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:25:34 -0500, ABCD wrote: > The reason there wasn't a bump (IIRC) was that the ebuild never changed > - - only the eclass did. If you emerged any version of GCC during the > window where the eclass was broken, that version of GCC would have been > broken. Of course, I'd forgotten that the change was in the eclass. --=20 Neil Bothwick I understand the answers, the questions throw me. --Sig_/5cjBeBYI43G=xXQ.Az_Hxrw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmJZNcACgkQum4al0N1GQPmOwCeMB8bCIw/Cal9NlqimhT8zHBo iL4AnAztArr8OvsRyY89NIYpJI0NvaX3 =CstL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/5cjBeBYI43G=xXQ.Az_Hxrw--