From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LPCxC-00032k-HT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:31:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85552E0539; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.10]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53934E0539 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1D4DEE0D for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:31:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([192.168.54.25]) by localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DnEwqeV3Y0Nz for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:16:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wstn.ethnet (unknown [78.32.181.186]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28A2DEE70 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:31:24 +0000 (GMT) From: Peter Humphrey Organization: at home To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Strange dependency of kopete-3.5.9 on qt-4* Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:28:06 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <200901191509.04575.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <200901191651.50681.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <200901191933.11211.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200901191933.11211.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901200928.06196.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> X-Archives-Salt: 4e424e7a-d31e-471a-a3d5-24bb8f378090 X-Archives-Hash: 25e8d06887fe21030aa4fc9c4cd05af5 On Monday 19 January 2009 17:33:11 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Monday 19 January 2009 18:51:50 Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > Something odd is going on again. > > I suspect kopete-4.x got pulled into your emerge and it slipped past your > radar. Quite possible. > Does grep -r "kopete" /etc/portage/* > > reveal anything about kopete-4? No; kopete isn't mentioned at all in /etc/portage/* or /etc/make.conf. -- Rgds Peter