public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willie Wong <wwong@princeton.edu>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 'emerge -e world' question
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:27:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090113172748.GA7589@math.princeton.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58965d8a0901130910h36b4c3d1tbade45655331b46a@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:10:44AM -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Willie Wong <wwong@princeton.edu> wrote:
> > Hum, I seem to have made an erroneous assumption.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:38:05AM -0500, Willie Wong wrote:
> >> The problem with this last one is not --deep. It is --update.
> >
> > Nevermind, I looked at the changelogs for openoffice and
> > dev-perl/Archive-Zip, and frankly, I am pretty sure what I said was
> > completely wrong in this situation. And also, frankly, I am becoming
> > as confused as you are about your problem.
> 
> I "downgraded" to File-Spec-3.29 (actually an upgrade) which in turn
> emerged/updated the rest of that bunch of perl-related packages. Now
> I'm re-emerging openoffice-3.0.0 since it appears to be using a newer
> set of the go-oo.org patches (despite the lack of version number
> change). Plus it is always fun to see how long it takes to build one
> of the biggest packages there is. I have emerged it twice in the past,
> the first was 1hr33m the second was 1hr55m, so I hope this one won't
> exceed 2h.

I don't find that explanation satisfactory. (The one about upgrade vs
downgrades.) -u expands to --update means to install the *best
available version*, not the *highest version number available*. If an
ebuild goes from x86 to being hardmasked, --update should downgrade.
If an ebuild of insanely high version number gets removed, --update
should downgrade. 

I can explain why emerge openoffice and emerge --deep openoffice are
different. emerge --deep openoffice basically does something similar
to emerge --oneshot <everything openoffice has in its dependency>.
So every package in the dependency tree will be considered, and if not
at the *best* version it will be updated. Compare to emerge openoffice
where only if a change of ebuild in openoffice changes the dependency
will trigger installation of new or updated versions of dependencies.
(Basically, you already have a version of whatever perl class it
wants, and the ebuild specifies >= some really low version, so the
dependency is satisfied and won't be considered in the emerge.)

What I can't explain is why emerge --update --deep world misses the
update! dev-perl/Archive-Zip is (correct me if I am wrong: I didn't
see it mentioned in the changelogs so I assume it was not changed) in
the dependency tree of both the Nov 3 and the January versions of
openoffice. So --deep should traverse down there and find that one of
its dependencies requires an update. At least that's what I expect
based on "man emerge". 

Best, 

W
-- 
Willie W. Wong                                      wwong@math.princeton.edu
408 Fine Hall,  Department of Mathematics,  Princeton University,  Princeton
A mathematician's reputation rests on the number of bad proofs he has given.



  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-13 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-13 15:44 [gentoo-user] 'emerge -e world' question Paul Hartman
2009-01-13 15:47 ` [gentoo-user] " Paul Hartman
2009-01-13 23:55   ` b.n.
2009-01-14  0:05     ` Paul Hartman
2009-01-14  0:18     ` Willie Wong
2009-01-14  0:26     ` »Q«
2009-01-13 15:52 ` [gentoo-user] " Alan McKinnon
2009-01-13 16:02   ` Mike Kazantsev
2009-01-13 16:25     ` Paul Hartman
2009-01-13 16:41       ` Albert Hopkins
2009-01-13 16:20   ` Paul Hartman
2009-01-13 16:37     ` Paul Hartman
2009-01-13 16:38     ` Willie Wong
2009-01-13 16:57       ` Willie Wong
2009-01-13 17:10         ` Paul Hartman
2009-01-13 17:27           ` Willie Wong [this message]
2009-01-13 17:45             ` Paul Hartman
2009-01-13 16:02 ` Albert Hopkins
2009-01-13 20:28 ` Dale
2009-01-13 20:37   ` Paul Hartman
2009-01-13 21:02     ` Dale
2009-01-13 21:18       ` Paul Hartman
2009-01-13 21:20       ` Neil Bothwick
2009-01-13 22:26         ` Dale

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090113172748.GA7589@math.princeton.edu \
    --to=wwong@princeton.edu \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox