From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LKz3n-0002af-Iz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:52:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2414E0330; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:52:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f21.google.com (mail-ew0-f21.google.com [209.85.219.21]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B69E0330 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:52:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy14 with SMTP id 14so10328893ewy.10 for ; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:52:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=nRZohLt7VGefwRn8xk1xMYSENkXgb0bX11832+rdDOA=; b=YidmvaMYjKRCb3Db2IEHtebykrABW/k5opLw9APorldxFZWmKn2S6DYOaY8e9j8mNs OmZffdXRndInotw0buqcL8r9uZT/FDWVcBbkPJT124M0P+OgLbIPuRt+F0IDSk9Vo+SX 13d1cFb8UnG+/MDI5QzxmmYSMEvZ8OpQ2wp+I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=rYrLpRjNoj13ctK9kpr+rgtqjD6rObeyfHrrElYMMg59b3kn/oP/9cNjz1bytiLXUU ATJ54bJapDKzbs5hYIYiu9U5nYkQEScWLR7ZhioVBatznU8KrS7XgmH6wvrHsWXUj1y6 d/5PS2x0tdDaPJjX4tQWO8YmJ6JlpjMfsJTcs= Received: by 10.210.16.10 with SMTP id 10mr28318456ebp.7.1231437153895; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:52:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from energy.localnet (energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.197.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 12sm39189139ewy.90.2009.01.08.09.52.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:52:33 -0800 (PST) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Please explain why this new 'emerge @preserved-rebuild' is good? Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:52:31 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.92 (Linux/2.6.28r4; KDE/4.1.87; x86_64; ; ) References: <5bdc1c8b0901080920g1a0edb11r466c26bb0e7c98a1@mail.gmail.com> <20090108174715.7fad44ec@krikkit> In-Reply-To: <20090108174715.7fad44ec@krikkit> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901081852.32349.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 89cacda1-9009-4793-8e86-db17aeab613f X-Archives-Hash: 95d5619483edda695b86029a3979803a On Donnerstag 08 Januar 2009, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:20:00 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: > > Is this adding some value that I don't understand? What does it do > > that using revdep-rebuild doesn't? > > revdep-rebuild fixes broken packages, @preserved-libs prevents the > breakage in the first place. it also prevents revdep-rebuilt from working correctly.