From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LKzBD-0003aV-25 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:00:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9ADF8E0488; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:00:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60981E0391 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:00:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krikkit (krikkit.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.3]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E1933EB2B for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:00:24 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:00:24 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Please explain why this new 'emerge @preserved-rebuild' is good? Message-ID: <20090108180024.3eb268f7@krikkit> In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0901080953o1c6acb99jfc589f1acf3508e2@mail.gmail.com> References: <5bdc1c8b0901080920g1a0edb11r466c26bb0e7c98a1@mail.gmail.com> <20090108174715.7fad44ec@krikkit> <5bdc1c8b0901080953o1c6acb99jfc589f1acf3508e2@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0cvs16 (GTK+ 2.14.5; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/+_DU+IcPKYb2dk6300Vqmqh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: aeccc4bf-e701-4aa1-b6d6-82a5512c014d X-Archives-Hash: 183e6ef3bd9067d9eabdb07a73f7299e --Sig_/+_DU+IcPKYb2dk6300Vqmqh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:53:18 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: > OK, so the programs aren't broken but in my case the libs aren't > rebuilding since the emerge step fails. It's the programs that need to be rebuilt, against the newer libraries. > What to do? Just sit and wait until someone updates something in > portage and eventually it gets cleaned up well enough to build? Or file a bug on b.g.o. > If that is the basic answer then when do the old libs get removed? > When the @preserved-rebuild finally passes? That's how I understand it works. --=20 Neil Bothwick You cannot really appreciate Dilbert unless you've read it in the original Klingon. --Sig_/+_DU+IcPKYb2dk6300Vqmqh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAklmPzgACgkQum4al0N1GQMupACeKCFPJA1GOvhsRi/nQrO+yG5+ 0YQAoJs13kLJikjt5VApex5XBecSDw+E =v51b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/+_DU+IcPKYb2dk6300Vqmqh--