From: Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Please explain why this new 'emerge @preserved-rebuild' is good?
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:00:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090108180024.3eb268f7@krikkit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0901080953o1c6acb99jfc589f1acf3508e2@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 675 bytes --]
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:53:18 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> OK, so the programs aren't broken but in my case the libs aren't
> rebuilding since the emerge step fails.
It's the programs that need to be rebuilt, against the newer libraries.
> What to do? Just sit and wait until someone updates something in
> portage and eventually it gets cleaned up well enough to build?
Or file a bug on b.g.o.
> If that is the basic answer then when do the old libs get removed?
> When the @preserved-rebuild finally passes?
That's how I understand it works.
--
Neil Bothwick
You cannot really appreciate Dilbert unless you've read it in the
original Klingon.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-08 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-08 17:20 [gentoo-user] Please explain why this new 'emerge @preserved-rebuild' is good? Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 17:42 ` Graham Murray
2009-01-08 17:51 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 17:58 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-01-08 18:03 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 18:07 ` James Ausmus
2009-01-08 18:24 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 18:55 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 19:23 ` James Ausmus
2009-01-08 19:29 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 19:36 ` James Ausmus
2009-01-08 19:39 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 19:45 ` James Ausmus
2009-01-08 19:49 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 20:02 ` James Ausmus
2009-01-08 22:35 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 23:21 ` James Ausmus
2009-01-08 23:56 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-09 1:38 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 17:47 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-01-08 17:52 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2009-01-08 17:53 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 18:00 ` Neil Bothwick [this message]
2009-01-08 18:05 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 21:59 ` Momesso Andrea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090108180024.3eb268f7@krikkit \
--to=neil@digimed.co.uk \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox