From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L2Dqw-0006wY-LM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:49:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 694F5E03D8; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.150]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC9DE03E0 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so980733eyk.10 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:49:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=E55RysT3OBFkzcKrx3JfK3XWxOYERO6s5O5mSI7PocE=; b=HQlXVwJkn9x1VKuphW8YpxzkkM58B2oxxQicVmj6+ztEk1NBfhJjhrmqOJ+sUlPzFV KzPKjYX52ArTiTlUj8nshjBHpXPDjQ5utmtTJTRxbNYWx83LxdmC7joRunwxB6wCKAqc NUB5mv2iBKS+jQFOiroevpALqX/HtIaaJ2QrI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=RvKK2uGF4oL05CUsEkNBbL93vjAsL6gNFVSie/mzaJEHmV9e654wruKgE6cgsMyNvn oZ/mX2ZHisA2L2lIwCZtS7CmGuyYiH4RlXlrCaMXd2nOSrkeMij4HE6dnR7dZkImugCN fi7+7gKNuCfxxakgTppEBPQNp70d/xUjqxPF0= Received: by 10.210.119.16 with SMTP id r16mr1369098ebc.38.1226965794035; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:49:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from lappy.study (the3mountains.plus.com [212.159.46.48]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m5sm8930360gve.3.2008.11.17.15.49.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:49:52 -0800 (PST) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] syslog-ng Vs rsyslog Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:49:31 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <200811151636.15563.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <840653820811161901n12e0c0cdo4174b54b972fd3dc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <840653820811161901n12e0c0cdo4174b54b972fd3dc@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1551694.2D6n5OVhmu"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200811172349.49991.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: dd22aaa6-2ab8-4c74-ac82-3fd5a238395a X-Archives-Hash: 132de5317147710cce489c49908ff4d7 --nextPart1551694.2D6n5OVhmu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 17 November 2008, ThaUnderDog wrote: > > Have you experience perhaps of rsyslog and how does it compare with > > gentoo's default syslog-ng? > > The native/internal modules of db writes and alerting of rsyslog sound > promising. There's a comparison here: > http://www.rsyslog.com/doc-rsyslog_ng_comparison.html > > Portage isn't in sync with rsyslogs development tree yet. Latest in > v3-stable is 3.20.0, which appears to build OK. I don't know if there > are any gentoo specific gotchas, not much experience with it > yet....everything seems fine... Thanks! Useful link and feedback. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1551694.2D6n5OVhmu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkkiAx0ACgkQ5Fp0QerLYPcnpgCeMJ8h52n6IIELrXIl3taad+QP YfwAoKLoCIN5kdnLyQK/P6I5pZ1xdTlF =JR7X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1551694.2D6n5OVhmu--