From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KzYWK-0003zP-AP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:17:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8C20E02EB; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:17:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.21]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F0DE02EB for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:17:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 368182119BE for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:17:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B23211936 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:17:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from [2001:638:605:eea0:219:66ff:fe86:ce12] (account wevah HELO energy.localnet) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.10) with ESMTPSA id 38714273 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:17:36 +0100 From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] xulrunner-1.8.1.17 fails to emerge - libxul.so.1 error Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:17:32 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.90 (Linux/2.6.27.5r4; KDE/4.1.71; x86_64; ; ) References: <358eca8f0811100415u4c191291jc834ed7a259ccf77@mail.gmail.com> <200811101349.12581.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <358eca8f0811100641l49867e73td1f912d43708320f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <358eca8f0811100641l49867e73td1f912d43708320f@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200811101617.32222.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V5.4 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: 31829d0b-424c-497b-8ba5-9910f0f75a00 X-Archives-Hash: 98300e2fedeeeb35d53c3da93fc0994b On Montag 10 November 2008, Mick wrote: > 2008/11/10 Volker Armin Hemmann : > > On Montag 10 November 2008, Mick wrote: > >> This is the first time xulrunner is being pulled in on a box of mine, > >> probably because I use firefox-bin and OOo-bin on this build. > >> > >> Anyway, it failed with this error: > >> ================================= > >> -lXrender -lfontconfig -lfreetype -lz -lX11 -lgtk-x11-2.0 > >> -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 > >> -lcairo -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 -lXt > >> -lgthread-2.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lfreetype -lz -lfontconfig > >> -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 -lcairo -ldl -lm > >> ../../dist/lib/components/libgklayout.a: member > >> ../../dist/lib/components/libgklayout.a(nsSVGSVGElement.o) in archive > >> is not an object > >> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > >> gmake[2]: *** [libxul.so.1] Error 1 > >> gmake[2]: Leaving directory > >> `/var/tmp/portage/net-libs/xulrunner-1.8.1.17/work/mozilla/toolkit/libra > >>ry' gmake[1]: *** [tier_50] Error 2 > >> gmake[1]: Leaving directory > >> `/var/tmp/portage/net-libs/xulrunner-1.8.1.17/work/mozilla' > >> make: *** [default] Error 2 > >> * > >> * ERROR: net-libs/xulrunner-1.8.1.17 failed. > >> * Call stack: > >> * ebuild.sh, line 49: Called src_compile > >> * environment, line 4747: Called die > >> * The specific snippet of code: > >> * emake || die "emake failed" > >> ================================= > >> > >> revdep-rebuild shows all is good. How can I move on from here? > > > > bugs.gentoo.org > > one thing that helped people with failed compiles was removing the ccache > > dir /var/tmp/ccache. > > I couldn't find any related bugs, but the trick about the ccache worked a > treat. > > Thanks! great :) I just searched for ALL xulrunner - and clicked on the reports menitoning failed compiling. The second or third had the rm as workaround ;) I hate searching in bugzillas. They all suck, but with some experience you might find something. Sometimes.