public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] desktop & sever profiles;  was: Re: jpg support
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 20:13:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811082013.42298.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BEB556D-CEF7-4B04-A354-A487E8BB5F04@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>

On Saturday 08 November 2008 19:13:15 Stroller wrote:
> > ... if you use Gentoo on a desktop enable the
> > desktop profile. ...
>
> I wouldn't be inclined to assume a new user might be using a server  
> profile because last time I checked these spit out an ugly warning  
> message about "this profile being untested" for EVERY SINGLE package  
> emerged.
>
> Eventually - after enabling PORTAGE_ELOG_* and being inundated with  
> warning spam for packages which had compiled without problems - I was  
> unable to tolerate this behaviour any longer & switched to a desktop  
> profile instead.
>
> So has something changed since I experienced this, or have many other  
> people just been ignoring the nuisance of the warning messages?
>
> I guess I chose a server profile in the first place because it seemed  
> more "correct" for me to do so (seeing as all my machines are  
> servers), but since I'm quite happy to put USE="-X -gtk -qt &c" in my  
> make.conf I can't see that it makes much difference.

I tend to do the same as you. I like the idea of desktop, server and hardened 
profiles but if the server profile is untested, then one has to ask the 
question - why is it even there? Can profiles be "masked" in a way analogous 
to packages?

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-11-08 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-08  4:48 [gentoo-user] jpg support Michael P. Soulier
2008-11-08  5:30 ` Nicolas Sebrecht
2008-11-08 10:48 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2008-11-08 11:15   ` Daniel Pielmeier
2008-11-08 14:08     ` Michael P. Soulier
2008-11-08 14:31       ` Dale
2008-11-08 15:26         ` Michael P. Soulier
2008-11-08 16:59           ` Dale
2008-11-09  3:58             ` Michael P. Soulier
2008-11-09 10:30               ` Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto
2008-11-09 11:22                 ` Michael P. Soulier
2008-11-08 15:00       ` Alan McKinnon
2008-11-08 15:55         ` Daniel Pielmeier
2008-11-08 17:13           ` [gentoo-user] desktop & sever profiles; was: " Stroller
2008-11-08 17:35             ` Daniel Pielmeier
2008-11-08 18:06               ` Stroller
2008-11-08 18:29                 ` Dale
2008-11-08 18:32                 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2008-11-08 18:13             ` Alan McKinnon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200811082013.42298.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com \
    --to=alan.mckinnon@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox