From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KuwfT-0000yj-U8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:04:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97D33E050F; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:02:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com (yw-out-1718.google.com [74.125.46.156]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71575E050F for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:02:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 5so782344ywm.46 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:02:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=8OBGkHHwemimVce2BrKuaxfAYAQj0YF8m84pKDZtDBg=; b=uOY+Vjp+BpvWXIar0o+TjWeHGOPXPYaxvbWmCvsHmAkFPjBrFR14w749OwBDQIJj3Q EH4trc1IJupc6T1MsWJsiUKenSliiMZuKdUJnxuPnyVhE3Fe/cZKQKDdBiRXoi9Y/Sab 7Hneww4cYUUGEQLBAvwMHgrVvnj79lN7jqilY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=FIgYWxdSEzmxeWqo4RCwK4C1akZCf96HowNVnvPRzHELcB38KtOuDhNClO5ZBhHBLM N5FrZPrz0I+i2p+EN7u14Pz5er07HVUHqFjYS17wVeg/eNuD6ye4b1lY9hgs3rZeMCrA s/b0/bjZLwMjKRU9/dX6vbhrEYPUuooYA3QEU= Received: by 10.65.155.7 with SMTP id h7mr8508112qbo.96.1225231338875; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.0.6? (dsl-243-211-235.telkomadsl.co.za [41.243.211.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s30sm3669842qbs.8.2008.10.28.15.02.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:02:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Circular blocks after last night's sync? Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:02:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810290002.05687.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: a57dc6fc-4c09-4b41-8fc3-7bfbc835e32b X-Archives-Hash: ab37e4216b32bfdf541cf32826fd522a On Tuesday 28 October 2008 22:18:05 Steven Susbauer wrote: > >Careful with the unmerges. =A0Check the following for the gory details a= nd > >possible work arounds: > > > >http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D234907 > >http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D244511 > > > >Such a mess. > > Yes it is. I was extremely tempted to post a thread about this issue > last night that explained the issue and the fix, as there weren't any > posts about it yet but they were sure to come as people broke wget. It > slipped my mind though. :-\ Please ignore my previous question about this. I see now why wget can break: alan@nazgul ~ $ ldd `which wget` | grep -e com_err libcom_err.so.2 =3D> /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x00007f75b34f1000) =2D-=20 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com