From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KuwZb-0000ki-WF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:58:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F15AE0454; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.239]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B72FE0454 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h31so942257wxd.10 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:57:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=mg7LUPj1N/oeoT0ncJ7XgLq1lWNfY2OTfS5KdcgM6nE=; b=HZfoWl31zhBi4dZhbqV3mgXwink3VGjrTjmle4DfR/FiObGKuODB4TdZBoz8O/QJl1 4GDMawT/JPlYHXYNZrt9Vs2mnOLKpnyu7Kw2B5ybXYxJpv9VzmpzHUKVce0VnrAMrMJo QbqHxAbSd6cClwt1BdFn7JoPv8VD3nmC9BJW8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=eJriTQGjdBkmc/H06MkrggoK1UPHLgG7DS+F0JWIHkv8f09z90UEDfeNU50vy4qXFc QaNbptcTB+SYCCp3C32ERT1l4R+BmzPADSmyF2z4K2TmEmScbJgw6vDxUFuGo2c/dpUC 8Q8A1gslwcuZnYD+P9uq0fzL46QQQF4eE94QE= Received: by 10.64.183.6 with SMTP id g6mr8526505qbf.37.1225231076706; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:57:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.0.6? (dsl-243-211-235.telkomadsl.co.za [41.243.211.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p9sm3843969qbp.15.2008.10.28.14.57.54 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:57:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Circular blocks after last night's sync? Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:57:49 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810282357.50038.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: c717668e-fcdc-42db-a52b-e6a4882174b9 X-Archives-Hash: dd364b5d14cbdc27544178a88a387fb5 On Tuesday 28 October 2008 22:18:05 Steven Susbauer wrote: > >Careful with the unmerges. =A0Check the following for the gory details a= nd > >possible work arounds: > > > >http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D234907 > >http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D244511 > > > >Such a mess. > > Yes it is. I was extremely tempted to post a thread about this issue > last night that explained the issue and the fix, as there weren't any > posts about it yet but they were sure to come as people broke wget. It > slipped my mind though. :-\ I've missed something here... How does this circumstance break wget? =2D-=20 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com