From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kt1z1-0004cs-K8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:20:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F3E8E03AB; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.evsmail.com (smtp.evsmail.com [66.51.111.21]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218B3E03AB for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9878 invoked by uid 220); 23 Oct 2008 15:19:46 -0000 Received: from S010600e0185568bb.ed.shawcable.net (HELO xenon.badcomputer.org) (68.148.98.184) (smtp-auth username bulliver@badcomputer.org, mechanism cram-md5) by smtp.evsmail.com (EVS Mail) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:19:45 +0000 From: darren kirby Organization: Badcomputer Org. To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gimp doc Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:21:20 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <200810222111.35000.a@gaydenko.com> <919d41310810230642vdaa3b71l23092c11da97ade6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <919d41310810230642vdaa3b71l23092c11da97ade6@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810230921.20954.bulliver@badcomputer.org> X-EVS-Virus-Checked: Checked, but can never be guaranteed. X-EVS-Virus-Checked: Always use caution with attachments! X-Archives-Salt: 311d713f-989d-4128-a2c0-51347a97a883 X-Archives-Hash: 080b185c0f4a45543f8105558ff007f2 quoth the Dan Wallis: > On 22/10/2008, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > > There are two packages related to gimp doc: > > > > app-doc/gimp-user-manual-2.0 > > app-doc/gimp-help-2.4.2 > > Interestingly, "USE=doc emerge gimp" pulls in neither of these > packages. I would have expected it to have required at least one of > them. Should this be raised as a bug on the bugzilla? > I was under the understanding that 'doc' USE flag pulls in API/developer docs, not user docs. Could be wrong.... > Dan -d -- darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org "...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..." - Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972