From: Peter Humphrey <peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:15:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810221015.34534.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48FE2389.3090900@googlemail.com>
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 19:46:33 Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> One thing I would give a try is to give portage a hand and emerge some of
> the qt split ebuilds with the oneshot option. In your case the qt split
> ebuilds which are blocked:
>
> x11-libs/qt-script-4.4.2, x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.4.2,
> x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.4.2, x11-libs/qt-sql-4.4.2,
> x11-libs/qt-gui-4.4.2, x11-libs/qt-svg-4.4.2,
> x11-libs/qt-test-4.4.2, x11-libs/qt-core-4.4.2,
> x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.4.2, x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.4.2
>
> and then see if portage will be able to continue with the world update.
That was a good idea, one that I ought to have thought of but didn't.
Unfortunately, it's made no difference at all. Emerge -upDvN world still
gives the same block:
[blocks B ] x11-libs/qt-core ("x11-libs/qt-core" is blocking
x11-libs/qt-4.3.3)
[blocks B ] <=x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_alpha:4 ("<=x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_alpha:4"
is blocking x11-libs/qt-script-4.4.2, x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.4.2,
x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.4.2, x11-libs/qt-sql-4.4.2, x11-libs/qt-gui-4.4.2,
x11-libs/qt-svg-4.4.2, x11-libs/qt-test-4.4.2, x11-libs/qt-core-4.4.2,
x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.4.2, x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.4.2)
Total: 160 packages (3 upgrades, 78 new, 65 in new slots, 14 reinstalls),
Size of downloads: 209,150 kB
Conflict: 2 blocks (2 unsatisfied)
To recap, the only version of qt installed is qt-3.3.8-r4, and equery d
=x11-libs/qt-3.3.8-r4 returns 160 packages, all wanting =x11-libs/qt-3*.
Emerge seems to think I have a version4.* of qt installed, but I haven't
apart from the split e-builds I've just installed as above.
$ equery l qt
[ Searching for package 'qt' in all categories among: ]
* installed packages
[I--] [ ] app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs-20071210 (0)
[I--] [ ] dev-db/qt-unixODBC-3.3.8 (3)
[I--] [ ] dev-libs/dbus-qt3-old-0.70 (0)
[I--] [ ] sys-apps/qtparted-0.4.5 (0)
[I--] [ ] x11-libs/qt-3.3.8-r4 (3)
[I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-core-4.4.2 (4)
[I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.4.2 (4)
[I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-gui-4.4.2 (4)
[I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.4.2 (4)
[I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.4.2 (4)
[I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-script-4.4.2 (4)
[I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-sql-4.4.2 (4)
[I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-svg-4.4.2 (4)
[I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-test-4.4.2 (4)
[I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.4.2 (4)
I could try removing qt-3.3.8-r4, but first I'd have to back up the whole
system against the probability of being unable to recover from the
resultant smashing of KDE 3.5.
> > I've started building a new system from scratch on another disk, and
> > I'm now about ready to start installing KDE on it. Maybe a clean start
> > is what I need.
>
> I think this could be solved without a reinstall but it is up to you.
Thanks for your help so far; I think though that I'll continue building the
clean system as well in case your optimism proves unfounded. At least with
two systems I can pursue both lines independently.
--
Rgds
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-22 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-19 13:54 [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4 Peter Humphrey
2008-10-19 14:16 ` Weifeng Liu
2008-10-19 14:24 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-10-19 14:50 ` Peter Humphrey
2008-10-19 15:21 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2008-10-19 15:28 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-10-19 17:32 ` Alex Schuster
2008-10-19 17:52 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-10-20 8:46 ` Peter Humphrey
2008-10-20 9:13 ` Peter Humphrey
2008-10-20 12:08 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2008-10-21 9:07 ` Peter Humphrey
2008-10-21 18:46 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2008-10-22 9:15 ` Peter Humphrey [this message]
2008-10-22 9:32 ` Neil Bothwick
2008-10-22 10:00 ` Alex Schuster
2008-10-22 11:10 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2008-10-22 16:42 ` Peter Humphrey
2008-10-22 18:32 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2008-10-23 9:28 ` Peter Humphrey
2008-10-23 9:45 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-10-23 10:03 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2008-10-24 8:01 ` Peter Humphrey
2008-10-24 11:03 ` Peter Humphrey
2008-10-22 9:46 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-10-20 9:06 ` Peter Humphrey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200810221015.34534.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org \
--to=peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox