From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KrW8x-0002Ex-6H for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:08:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB974E03E7; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:08:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hs-out-0708.google.com (hs-out-0708.google.com [64.233.178.244]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8CDE03E7 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:08:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by hs-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id k27so576360hsc.2 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 04:08:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=XqzbkVDaJqbKPpBNmh1+7Ya0mV96eNRaMbQs7lM/Ts8=; b=I99jPEkHEMFpQVwI4pesJW5KtLOCMasF1acA1zlqHyaqm5Zk2EZduD+s3n94Ag45HP wv7wCJi9/TDRMgj9AmkrB+T6eL/3ygXSoRI1E+EJWu1AYxmxDEi5NfblfHT7V9lHsTJs /DcJruFnd8ACQX7BTlKr9Xhu04Luec/Fc1CQQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=UhUkEbR0/+/LO5NbEXIHWsiSEO5Wx0UGe5/baHOgvkQ78IzEvDth/V1+OR6+dgIlmF HWLyKmYihbKxKnUrEO6U5otexAGOfPW74mHJHgQwwIX84/nlsdWcUln6xsRJM0HJbNce FgD/eY1dZK48aStdxBo4LHTPEOtKHT1qrswtk= Received: by 10.64.220.20 with SMTP id s20mr3430438qbg.32.1224414497172; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 04:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.0.6? (dsl-243-231-180.telkomadsl.co.za [41.243.231.180]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s27sm5691954qbs.12.2008.10.19.04.08.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 19 Oct 2008 04:08:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] AbiWord 2.6.4 build failure Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:08:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <68b1e2610810181120k24ba1b1aj69fda3649fbadecc@mail.gmail.com> <68b1e2610810181156o1a6e4dc0t7b43bc012ee8672f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810191308.07567.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: aba82e3c-d3b9-4cf2-8207-3cfe61473e23 X-Archives-Hash: a08aa07f42a1318d49e5e3e34f6d9cf7 On Sunday 19 October 2008 12:59:35 Arttu V. wrote: > On 10/18/08, Liviu Andronic wrote: > > PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/portage" > > PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage" > > I don't really know an answer, but I'm curious about what has been > attempted with these two lines. Would it work better without overlays, > i.e., by commenting these two out? Only the second one will take effect. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com