From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [69.77.167.62] (helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-84846-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1KnItx-0000Pz-Lp
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:11:25 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BCEB8E04A7;
	Tue,  7 Oct 2008 20:11:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from anli.goldspace.net (anli.goldspace.net [80.246.67.229])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BE7E04A7
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue,  7 Oct 2008 20:11:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by anli.goldspace.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6B45A792
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  8 Oct 2008 00:11:15 +0400 (MSD)
From: Andrew Gaydenko <a@gaydenko.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.1.2... a winner!
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 00:11:15 +0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
References: <200810051210.49096.mcbrides9@comcast.net> <200810072313.33677@goldspace.net> <20081007195658.GA21106@eriks>
In-Reply-To: <20081007195658.GA21106@eriks>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200810080011.15537@goldspace.net>
X-Archives-Salt: 23b94584-7bad-4fb7-89df-3475194da4ed
X-Archives-Hash: 5a92427636ec43854984202f731d3c3a

======= On Tuesday 07 October 2008, Erik Hahn wrote: =======
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:13:33PM +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> > I have found another KDE app which is important sufficiently to delay
> > switching to KDE4 - the app is k3b, which still isn't ported. If I
> > understand well, there isn't any minimal apps list (and k3b, would be
> > in the list, I think) which must be ported to KDE4 before unmasking
> > KDE4 in portage. Is it so?
>
> Why should there be one? The fact k3b isn't ported yet doesn't break any
> other KDE package.
>
> 	-Erik

Say, at upgrading to new gcc version there is a list of issues which must be 
resolved to treat such upgrade completed. I have supposed something similar 
exists for KDE4 also.