From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KmxiJ-0005Zb-KZ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:33:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBC06E028E; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from QMTA06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.56]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91940E028E for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from OMTA05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.43]) by QMTA06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id PWMc1a0030vp7WLA6ZZxm3; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:33:57 +0000 Received: from spinner ([98.235.60.115]) by OMTA05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id PZZv1a00c2VAnqy8RZZw87; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:33:56 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=EaTvjB8QwjoA:10 a=5B1EeayZfdcA:10 a=ZFwcYrtuATYUPfy-dYUA:9 a=WwZyUTE35qB3pZ9_Uv8z7T87_OsA:4 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 From: Jerry McBride Organization: TEAM LINUX To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.1.2... a winner! Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:33:55 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <200810051210.49096.mcbrides9@comcast.net> <48E9DBA8.4060904@wright.org> <48EA6FFF.10800@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <48EA6FFF.10800@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810061733.55201.mcbrides9@comcast.net> X-Archives-Salt: 4c7ee78c-71b1-4606-acc2-220fbd86e714 X-Archives-Hash: 6ce5b8136e28a2b439ed019c9ecb6c51 On Monday 06 October 2008 04:07:27 pm b.n. wrote: > Roy Wright ha scritto: > > Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:08:23 +0200, b.n. wrote: > >>> Could you share your relevant package.mask and package.keywords, for > >>> the laziest of us? :) > >> > >> emerge autounmask > >> autounmask kde-meta > > > > On my ~x86, I had to add: > > > > ~app-misc/strigi-0.5.11 > > > > to etc/portage/package.unmask/autounmask-kde-meta to resolve a blocking > > issue between strigi-0.5.10 and strigi-0.5.11 > > > > app-misc/strigi:0 > > > > ('installed', '/', 'app-misc/strigi-0.5.11', 'nomerge') pulled in by > > ('ebuild', '/', 'kde-base/libplasma-4.1.2', 'merge') > > > > ('ebuild', '/', 'app-misc/strigi-0.5.10', 'merge') pulled in by > > ('ebuild', '/', 'kde-base/kdebase-kioslaves-4.1.2', 'merge') > > ('ebuild', '/', 'kde-base/nepomuk-4.1.2', 'merge') > > ('ebuild', '/', 'kde-base/kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer-4.1.2', > > 'merge') (and 4 more) > > > > > > BTW, I also changed all of the '=' to '~' to catch any future revs... > > A bit of a stupid question but I want to be double-sure: > -KDE 4 and KDE 3 can happily live together, isn't it? > -Do I need to backup config files/use KDE 4 as another user if I want to > switch between KDE 4 and KDE 3? > -Anything else to worry about? > > Thanks! > m. I have both kde-3.5.10 and kde-4.1.2 and there are a couple of small incompatibilities... and that's why they are still masked. If I recall right... I had to upgrade to the latest ~x86 portage and then I had to iron out kopete for both versions of kde... No show stoppers, but there are a few issues you'll have to iron out. Sorry, I made no notes... but in my MOST HUMBLE opinion... there's no reason to not to try kde-4.1.2. -- ***************************************************************************** From the desk of: Jerome D. McBride 17:29:51 up 8 days, 21:47, 5 users, load average: 0.21, 0.05, 0.02 *****************************************************************************