* [gentoo-user] new kernel, hdparm not happy
@ 2008-10-06 1:09 David Relson
2008-10-06 6:46 ` Jil Larner
2008-10-06 6:53 ` Florian Philipp
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Relson @ 2008-10-06 1:09 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Greetings!
I've recently updated from kernel 2.6.20 to 2.6.24 a little used
machine. The new kernel is working quite well. However hdparm isn't
happy.
Running either "hdparm -d0 /dev/hda" or "hdparm -d1 /dev/hda" gives a
"HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted" error. Using the same
config for 2.6.25 gives the same result as 2.6.24.
Here are the DMA related options that are enabled:
OLD (2.6.20):
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA=y
CONFIG_IDEDMA_AUTO=y
CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_AUTO=y
CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API=y
NEW (2.6.24 and 2.6.25):
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA=y
CONFIG_HAS_DMA=y
CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API=y
CONFIG_SCSI_DMA=y
CONFIG_ZONE_DMA=y
CONFIG_ZONE_DMA_FLAG=1
Can anybody tell me what I've missed?
Thanks.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] new kernel, hdparm not happy
2008-10-06 1:09 [gentoo-user] new kernel, hdparm not happy David Relson
@ 2008-10-06 6:46 ` Jil Larner
2008-10-06 6:53 ` Florian Philipp
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jil Larner @ 2008-10-06 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Hi,
David Relson a écrit :
> CONFIG_SCSI_DMA=y
Isn't that an option which considers all disks to be SATA ?
Not sure, but you might check that.
Sincerely,
Jil
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] new kernel, hdparm not happy
2008-10-06 1:09 [gentoo-user] new kernel, hdparm not happy David Relson
2008-10-06 6:46 ` Jil Larner
@ 2008-10-06 6:53 ` Florian Philipp
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Florian Philipp @ 2008-10-06 6:53 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1165 bytes --]
David Relson schrieb:
> Greetings!
>
> I've recently updated from kernel 2.6.20 to 2.6.24 a little used
> machine. The new kernel is working quite well. However hdparm isn't
> happy.
>
> Running either "hdparm -d0 /dev/hda" or "hdparm -d1 /dev/hda" gives a
> "HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted" error. Using the same
> config for 2.6.25 gives the same result as 2.6.24.
>
> Here are the DMA related options that are enabled:
>
> OLD (2.6.20):
>
> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA=y
> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI=y
> CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA=y
> CONFIG_IDEDMA_AUTO=y
> CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_AUTO=y
> CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API=y
>
>
> NEW (2.6.24 and 2.6.25):
> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA=y
> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI=y
> CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA=y
> CONFIG_HAS_DMA=y
> CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API=y
> CONFIG_SCSI_DMA=y
> CONFIG_ZONE_DMA=y
> CONFIG_ZONE_DMA_FLAG=1
>
> Can anybody tell me what I've missed?
>
> Thanks.
>
> David
>
Are
CONFIG_ATA_GENERIC
and
CONFIG_IDE_GENERIC
enabled? If so, please try to deactivate them/compile them as modules
and don't load them.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-06 6:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-06 1:09 [gentoo-user] new kernel, hdparm not happy David Relson
2008-10-06 6:46 ` Jil Larner
2008-10-06 6:53 ` Florian Philipp
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox