[gentoo-user] State of ATi drivers in Linux

[gentoo-user] State of ATi drivers in Linux

[Hal Martin]

Hello all,

I am contemplating building a new computer with an AMD/ATi graphics 
card. I've been following the subject of ATi driver quality in linux for 
a while, but I realize that the experiences I read on Google search 
results are, shall we say, biased, as many people who have perfectly 
working cards don't go out and comment on how great their drivers are.

So, do any of you have newer (HD series) AMD/ATi graphics cards?
What drivers (AMD closed source, or open source) are you using?
Are they stable?
How is the performance?
Any noise issues with your card when it's idle? Under load?

I'd just like to point out that I have an NVidia 7900GTX right now, and 
it's been working well for me, but I'd like to upgrade to something with 
stream processors and little more power. I've heard that NVidia 2D 
performance under linux suffers greatly if you have an 8000, 9000, or GX 
series card. Have any of your experienced poor 2D performance since 
upgrading your NVidia card?

Thanks,
-Hal

Re: [gentoo-user] State of ATi drivers in Linux

[Volker Armin Hemmann]

On Sunday 28 September 2008, Hal Martin wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am contemplating building a new computer with an AMD/ATi graphics
> card. I've been following the subject of ATi driver quality in linux for
> a while, but I realize that the experiences I read on Google search
> results are, shall we say, biased, as many people who have perfectly
> working cards don't go out and comment on how great their drivers are.
>
> So, do any of you have newer (HD series) AMD/ATi graphics cards?

HD3870

> What drivers (AMD closed source, or open source) are you using?

fglrx - the closed source ones.

> Are they stable?

yes. Switching between vt and X works, and restarting X too - but the ati 
scripts in /etc/acpi have to be removed.
With desktop effects turned off 2d is fast and snappy and video is ok.
With desktop effects turned on 2d is fast except manually resizing windows and 
xv-video sucks. Luckily kde 4.1 makes it easy to switch ;) - and I don't need 
xv ;)

> How is the performance?

very good. I play ut2004 and vegastrike 0.5. With a but. See above.

> Any noise issues with your card when it's idle? Under load?

the fan is very quiet in KDE or playing games. Only in the menus of ut2004 or 
on a vt it turns up - but is still very bearable. 
aticonfig --odgt

Default Adapter - ATI Radeon HD 3870
                  Sensor 0: Temperature - 51.00 C

Re: [gentoo-user] State of ATi drivers in Linux -- IMO, it's horrific...

[Hal Martin]

Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Sunday 28 September 2008, Hal Martin wrote:
>   
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am contemplating building a new computer with an AMD/ATi graphics
>> card. I've been following the subject of ATi driver quality in linux for
>> a while, but I realize that the experiences I read on Google search
>> results are, shall we say, biased, as many people who have perfectly
>> working cards don't go out and comment on how great their drivers are.
>>
>> So, do any of you have newer (HD series) AMD/ATi graphics cards?
>>     
>
> HD3870
>   
I just picked up the HD3850, which is a nice card by all measures.
>   
>> What drivers (AMD closed source, or open source) are you using?
>>     
>
> fglrx - the closed source ones.
>   
I installed these drivers (from portage) and tried them.
>   
>> Are they stable?
>>     
>
> yes. Switching between vt and X works, and restarting X too - but the ati 
> scripts in /etc/acpi have to be removed.
> With desktop effects turned off 2d is fast and snappy and video is ok.
> With desktop effects turned on 2d is fast except manually resizing windows and 
> xv-video sucks. Luckily kde 4.1 makes it easy to switch ;) - and I don't need 
> xv ;)
>   
I had a horrid time with the fglrx drivers. I use two displays, and
while it was a breeze to setup (even easier than on an NVidia card) the
result was horrid. I can't drag windows from one display to another, the
windows wrap within the display. The fglrx_gears program renders
something that I don't believe heralds from this planet; while glx_gears
renders the same thing I get on my NVidia card only 10% slower (which is
expected given the performance difference between the 7900GTX and the
HD3850.)

Trying to exit X11 causes a complete system lockup, requiring a hard reset.
>   
>> How is the performance?
>>     
>
> very good. I play ut2004 and vegastrike 0.5. With a but. See above.
>   
I couldn't get any Wine apps that use 3D to work. Call of Duty 4 refused
to start, citing that the video card didn't support alpha blending.
>   
>> Any noise issues with your card when it's idle? Under load?
>>     
>
> the fan is very quiet in KDE or playing games. Only in the menus of ut2004 or 
> on a vt it turns up - but is still very bearable. 
> aticonfig --odgt
>
> Default Adapter - ATI Radeon HD 3870
>                   Sensor 0: Temperature - 51.00 C
>   
My card is incredibly, nay, unbelievably loud until you throttle the fan
manually from aticonfig, which, I might add, is absent from the Catalyst
control centre gui. After throttling the fan down to 3% the card settles
around 45.00C and is quiet enough to bare.

My attempt to uninstall the portage based ATI drivers (which are
slightly dated,) and install the official drivers from ATI proved to
wreck my system beyond comprehension. 'eselect opengl list' no longer
includes ATI, only xorg-x11. I have no ability to start X11 anyone, and
no fan control, meaning I now have a jet engine residing in my computer.

There must be something I'm doing wrong. I've heard that ATI drivers
aren't supposed to lock up your system when you exit X11, is this still
the case? Was this ever the case with two monitors?

Is there any way to get the ATI driver to automatically set a reasonable
fan speed, or must I do it manually?

I've switched back to my original NVidia card, and the kind folks on the
#gentoo channel helped me restore my NVidia drivers to their original
state. I don't know when I'll attempt to try the ATI card again, as this
experience has shown me just how bad things can get. The fact that the
Gentoo Wiki dealing with ATI drivers is outdated and references AGPGART
so many times I actually began to think that my system had AGP on it.


Does someone have a better guide on how to setup an ATI/AMD graphics
card in linux using the drivers provided in the portage tree? If I can't
run two monitors off the card and keep my system stable, then there's no
point, in my mind, of even keeping the card. Also, and I don't know if
the Gentoo list is the proper place to voice these concerns (I doubt it
is, actually) but *what* is with the fan speed control? It's non-existent!

My experience with ATI drivers today remind me of the state of NVidia
drivers 3 years ago, it's horrific!

-Hal

Re: [gentoo-user] State of ATi drivers in Linux -- IMO, it's horrific...

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 606 bytes --]

On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:59:21 -0400, Hal Martin wrote:

> The fact that the
> Gentoo Wiki dealing with ATI drivers is outdated and references AGPGART
> so many times I actually began to think that my system had AGP on it.
> 
> Does someone have a better guide on how to setup an ATI/AMD graphics
> card in linux using the drivers provided in the portage tree?

The Wiki is not official Gentoo documentation, it relies on users keeping
it up to date. Try http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ati-faq.xml for the
official line.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

I'll try being nicer if you'll try being smarter.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] State of ATi drivers in Linux -- IMO, it's horrific...

[Volker Armin Hemmann]

On Donnerstag 16 Oktober 2008, Hal Martin wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Sunday 28 September 2008, Hal Martin wrote:
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> I am contemplating building a new computer with an AMD/ATi graphics
> >> card. I've been following the subject of ATi driver quality in linux for
> >> a while, but I realize that the experiences I read on Google search
> >> results are, shall we say, biased, as many people who have perfectly
> >> working cards don't go out and comment on how great their drivers are.
> >>
> >> So, do any of you have newer (HD series) AMD/ATi graphics cards?
> >
> > HD3870
>
> I just picked up the HD3850, which is a nice card by all measures.
>
> >> What drivers (AMD closed source, or open source) are you using?
> >
> > fglrx - the closed source ones.
>
> I installed these drivers (from portage) and tried them.
>
> >> Are they stable?
> >
> > yes. Switching between vt and X works, and restarting X too - but the ati
> > scripts in /etc/acpi have to be removed.
> > With desktop effects turned off 2d is fast and snappy and video is ok.
> > With desktop effects turned on 2d is fast except manually resizing
> > windows and xv-video sucks. Luckily kde 4.1 makes it easy to switch ;) -
> > and I don't need xv ;)
>
> I had a horrid time with the fglrx drivers. I use two displays, and
> while it was a breeze to setup (even easier than on an NVidia card) the
> result was horrid. I can't drag windows from one display to another, the
> windows wrap within the display. The fglrx_gears program renders
> something that I don't believe heralds from this planet; while glx_gears
> renders the same thing I get on my NVidia card only 10% slower (which is
> expected given the performance difference between the 7900GTX and the
> HD3850.)
>
> Trying to exit X11 causes a complete system lockup, requiring a hard reset.
>
> >> How is the performance?
> >
> > very good. I play ut2004 and vegastrike 0.5. With a but. See above.
>
> I couldn't get any Wine apps that use 3D to work. Call of Duty 4 refused
> to start, citing that the video card didn't support alpha blending.
>
> >> Any noise issues with your card when it's idle? Under load?
> >
> > the fan is very quiet in KDE or playing games. Only in the menus of
> > ut2004 or on a vt it turns up - but is still very bearable.
> > aticonfig --odgt
> >
> > Default Adapter - ATI Radeon HD 3870
> >                   Sensor 0: Temperature - 51.00 C
>
> My card is incredibly, nay, unbelievably loud until you throttle the fan
> manually from aticonfig, which, I might add, is absent from the Catalyst
> control centre gui. After throttling the fan down to 3% the card settles
> around 45.00C and is quiet enough to bare.
>
> My attempt to uninstall the portage based ATI drivers (which are
> slightly dated,) and install the official drivers from ATI proved to
> wreck my system beyond comprehension. 'eselect opengl list' no longer
> includes ATI, only xorg-x11. I have no ability to start X11 anyone, and
> no fan control, meaning I now have a jet engine residing in my computer.

never ever install drivers without an ebuild. If you need the latest driver 
just copy&rename one. That eselect stopped to work is the logical conclusion.
Deinstall the driver, change an ebuild, try again.

>
> There must be something I'm doing wrong. I've heard that ATI drivers
> aren't supposed to lock up your system when you exit X11, is this still
> the case? Was this ever the case with two monitors?

for some people it locks up, for others it doesn't (like with nvidia). I 
solved the lockup issue for myself by removing the ati scripts from /etc/acpi.


> Is there any way to get the ATI driver to automatically set a reasonable
> fan speed, or must I do it manually?

It does for my card.

Re: [gentoo-user] State of ATi drivers in Linux

[Emil Jensen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 963 bytes --]

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Hal Martin <hal.martin@gmail.com> wrote:

> So, do any of you have newer (HD series) AMD/ATi graphics cards?
> What drivers (AMD closed source, or open source) are you using?
> Are they stable?
> How is the performance?
> Any noise issues with your card when it's idle? Under load?


I've been following this a little although I do have an nVidia card. You
should check out Phoronix:

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=category&item=Display%20Drivers

They are probably the top followers of Linux display drivers that I know of.
But off the top of my head I'd say that the ATI Catalyst drivers (closed
source) are really getting pretty good now and almost on par with their
windows equivalent.
The RadeonHD (open source) drivers are also getting pretty good, although it
depends on the chipset you're using (some have better support than others),
and if you're not doing cutting edge gaming, they should perform fine for
you.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1398 bytes --]