[gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast

[gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast

[Alan McKinnon]

Hi all,

revdep-rebuild now runs amazingly fast on my machine - 18 seconds as 
opposed to the 5 minutes or so it used to take !

I see gentoolkit was updated recently. Is this expected behaviour?


-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com

-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast

[Johann Schmitz]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alan McKinnon wrote:
| I see gentoolkit was updated recently. Is this expected behaviour?

Yes.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkiBm2MACgkQZsUt7MqpQk3cNACfYhRDVobWtPI8rS9suR5g5Gyh
4e4AoNWgnB4jXyON/D5ZIrnCYvEgcZGo
=kVgF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast

[Volker Armin Hemmann]

On Samstag, 19. Juli 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> revdep-rebuild now runs amazingly fast on my machine - 18 seconds as
> opposed to the 5 minutes or so it used to take !
>
> I see gentoolkit was updated recently. Is this expected behaviour?
>

or you are a victim of that new preserved-libs stuff in portage ....
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast

[Vladimir G. Ivanovic]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 644 bytes --]

on 07/19/2008 02:28 AM Volker Armin Hemmann said the following:
> On Samstag, 19. Juli 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> revdep-rebuild now runs amazingly fast on my machine - 18 seconds as
>> opposed to the 5 minutes or so it used to take !
>>
>> I see gentoolkit was updated recently. Is this expected behaviour?
>>
> 
> or you are a victim of that new preserved-libs stuff in portage ....

s/victim/beneficiary/

"That preserved-lib stuff" has worked just fine for me. It's useful to 
know what needs to be rebuilt, then to be able to rebuild just those 
packages.

--- Vladimir

-- 
Vladimir G. Ivanovic



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast

[Andrew Gaydenko]

======= On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote: =======
> on 07/19/2008 02:28 AM Volker Armin Hemmann said the following:
> > On Samstag, 19. Juli 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> revdep-rebuild now runs amazingly fast on my machine - 18 seconds as
> >> opposed to the 5 minutes or so it used to take !
> >>
> >> I see gentoolkit was updated recently. Is this expected behaviour?
> >
> > or you are a victim of that new preserved-libs stuff in portage ....

Is there somewhere some information about this "preserved-libs"? Wiki has 
not found anything.


>
> s/victim/beneficiary/
>
> "That preserved-lib stuff" has worked just fine for me. It's useful to
> know what needs to be rebuilt, then to be able to rebuild just those
> packages.
>
> --- Vladimir

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast

[Vladimir G. Ivanovic]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1267 bytes --]

http://r0bertz.blogspot.com/2008/06/portage-22-preserve-libs-features.html

and

http://blog.flameeyes.eu/articles/2008/06/30/a-few-risks-i-see-related-to-the-new-portage-2-2-preserve-libs-behaviour
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/articles/2008/07/22/the-odyssey-of-preserved-libs-feature

Google (for now) is your friend.

--- Vladimir

on 07/23/2008 09:04 AM Andrew Gaydenko said the following:
> ======= On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote: =======
>> on 07/19/2008 02:28 AM Volker Armin Hemmann said the following:
>>> On Samstag, 19. Juli 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> revdep-rebuild now runs amazingly fast on my machine - 18 seconds as
>>>> opposed to the 5 minutes or so it used to take !
>>>>
>>>> I see gentoolkit was updated recently. Is this expected behaviour?
>>> or you are a victim of that new preserved-libs stuff in portage ....
> 
> Is there somewhere some information about this "preserved-libs"? Wiki has 
> not found anything.
> 
> 
>> s/victim/beneficiary/
>>
>> "That preserved-lib stuff" has worked just fine for me. It's useful to
>> know what needs to be rebuilt, then to be able to rebuild just those
>> packages.
>>
>> --- Vladimir
> 
> 

-- 
Vladimir G. Ivanovic



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast

[Justin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 264 bytes --]

Vladimir G. Ivanovic schrieb:
> http://r0bertz.blogspot.com/2008/06/portage-22-preserve-libs-features.html 
>
NOw I got the idea behind the preserve-libs thing. Where are the lists 
of packages which are in this set saved? Or are they generated on the fly?


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast

[Volker Armin Hemmann]

On Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2008, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
> on 07/19/2008 02:28 AM Volker Armin Hemmann said the following:
> > On Samstag, 19. Juli 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> revdep-rebuild now runs amazingly fast on my machine - 18 seconds as
> >> opposed to the 5 minutes or so it used to take !
> >>
> >> I see gentoolkit was updated recently. Is this expected behaviour?
> >
> > or you are a victim of that new preserved-libs stuff in portage ....
>
> s/victim/beneficiary/
>
> "That preserved-lib stuff" has worked just fine for me. It's useful to
> know what needs to be rebuilt, then to be able to rebuild just those
> packages.

a friend of mine was fucked by this stuff when he did an emerge -e world after 
gcc update.

Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 513 bytes --]

On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:33:12 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:

> > "That preserved-lib stuff" has worked just fine for me. It's useful to
> > know what needs to be rebuilt, then to be able to rebuild just those
> > packages.  
> 
> a friend of mine was fucked by this stuff when he did an emerge -e
> world after gcc update.

That's what you get for running development code. I hope he filed a bug
report ;-)


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Copper wire was invented by two Scotsmen fighting over a penny!

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]