From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KImID-0006v1-9P for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:18:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21B8AE04F5; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lbg2.evolone.org (unknown [198.145.28.177]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDAE7E04F5 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:18:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lappy.evolone.org (unknown [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: col) by lbg2.evolone.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5141BD90 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:16:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:17:25 -0700 From: Michael Higgins To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gentoo install on Dell restore partition... live? Message-ID: <20080715081725.1999fd6a@lappy.evolone.org> In-Reply-To: <20080715085220.22009799@loonquawl.digimed.co.uk> References: <20080714223103.5969a906@evolone.org> <20080715080936.7aee5ebc@loonquawl.digimed.co.uk> <20080715085220.22009799@loonquawl.digimed.co.uk> Organization: Evolone X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: fd58e1d5-4a43-45f7-8b07-ce60baa8936e X-Archives-Hash: 941662138eecc38917373c9da23687ac On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:52:20 +0100 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:42:20 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > > I assume you meant 'cp -ax' :P > > I did, it's tar that uses -l for this. > > > > rsync -ax / /root/hd/ > > > > Well, /root/hd is empty so there's nothing to win with rsync other > > than it being slower than cp. But it does the job too, anyway. > > It preserves directory time stamps, which cp does not. It's not slower > because the destination is empty so the initial file scan takes no > longer than with cp. Oh, and you can stop and restart it. > > OK Guys, thanks for the tips. I'll be trying later this week, just in case Saturday means a trip to the physical location. :( Cheers, -- |\ /| | | ~ ~ | \/ | |---| `|` ? | |ichael | |iggins \^ / michael.higgins[at]evolone[dot]org -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list