From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KIX6a-0003s7-67 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:05:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E91E0E06BF; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C173FE06BF for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE33661A6 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:05:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.784 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.784 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.815, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R769vQ-vuZol for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:05:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBC065B6A for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KIX6M-0000lo-W9 for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:05:03 +0000 Received: from adsl-222-11-136.msy.bellsouth.net ([68.222.11.136]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:05:02 +0000 Received: from boxcars by adsl-222-11-136.msy.bellsouth.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:05:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?B?u1Gr?= Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: USE flag question [solved] Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:50:31 -0500 Organization: none Message-ID: <20080714175031.03d98674@bellgrove.remarqs.net> References: <20080713181038.3cd61dc1@bellgrove.remarqs.net> <20080714062931.GA5008@marvin.heimnetz.local> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-222-11-136.msy.bellsouth.net X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 6eba7c3e-5d30-48f8-90fd-db7d226e518a X-Archives-Hash: bdd83141b7ab91460c1ae00c93791e66 On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:29:31 +0200 Sebastian G=FCnther wrote: > * =BBQ=AB (boxcars@gmx.net) [14.07.08 01:16]: > > A few days ago, I used eselect to switch profiles, from > > default-linux/x86/2007.0/desktop to > > default/linux/x86/2008.0/desktop. =20 > >=20 >=20 > As I did... >=20 > > A lot of USE flags were removed from my make.conf, including > > the cpu-optimizations such as sse and mmx. After re-compiling a few > > things and getting warnings from the ebuilds that video and audio=20 > > playback would be choppy without those flags, I put them back into > > my flags in make.conf. If I use ufed to manage the flags, as I'm > > used to doing, it takes them back out when I save changes. > >=20 >=20 > ufed is the bad guy, I think the stable version is not able to handle=20 > the new profile layout correctly. > Use ufed-0.40-r10 from ~ and your use flags are not getting removed. Thanks very much! I'd thought the flags were removed /before/ I used ufed, but I guess I was mistaken. 0.40-r10 works fine -- I should have looked at the ufed Changelog before posting. :) --=20 =BBQ=AB Kleeneness is next to G=F6delness. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list