public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-user]  USE flag question
@ 2008-07-13 23:10 »Q«
  2008-07-14  6:29 ` Sebastian Günther
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: »Q« @ 2008-07-13 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

A few days ago, I used eselect to switch profiles, from
default-linux/x86/2007.0/desktop to default/linux/x86/2008.0/desktop.  

A lot of USE flags were removed from my make.conf, including
the cpu-optimizations such as sse and mmx.  After re-compiling a few
things and getting warnings from the ebuilds that video and audio 
playback would be choppy without those flags, I put them back into my
flags in make.conf.  If I use ufed to manage the flags, as I'm used to
doing, it takes them back out when I save changes.

It seems strange to me that the profile switch should affect these
flags.  I think I'm overlooking/misunderstanding something, but I'm
not sure what to ask.  Any enlightenment (including links to
enlightenment) would be appreciated.

-- 
»Q«
     Kleeneness is next to Gödelness.


--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user]  USE flag question
  2008-07-13 23:10 [gentoo-user] USE flag question »Q«
@ 2008-07-14  6:29 ` Sebastian Günther
  2008-07-14 22:50   ` [gentoo-user] Re: USE flag question [solved] »Q«
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Günther @ 2008-07-14  6:29 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1186 bytes --]

* »Q« (boxcars@gmx.net) [14.07.08 01:16]:
> A few days ago, I used eselect to switch profiles, from
> default-linux/x86/2007.0/desktop to default/linux/x86/2008.0/desktop.  
> 

As I did...

> A lot of USE flags were removed from my make.conf, including
> the cpu-optimizations such as sse and mmx.  After re-compiling a few
> things and getting warnings from the ebuilds that video and audio 
> playback would be choppy without those flags, I put them back into my
> flags in make.conf.  If I use ufed to manage the flags, as I'm used to
> doing, it takes them back out when I save changes.
> 

ufed is the bad guy, I think the stable version is not able to handle 
the new profile layout correctly.

> It seems strange to me that the profile switch should affect these
> flags.  I think I'm overlooking/misunderstanding something, but I'm
> not sure what to ask.  Any enlightenment (including links to
> enlightenment) would be appreciated.
> 

Use ufed-0.40-r10 from ~ and your use flags are not getting removed.

HTH
Sebastian

-- 
 " Religion ist das Opium des Volkes. "      Karl Marx

 SEB@STI@N GÜNTHER         mailto:samson@guenther-roetgen.de

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [gentoo-user]  Re: USE flag question [solved]
  2008-07-14  6:29 ` Sebastian Günther
@ 2008-07-14 22:50   ` »Q«
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: »Q« @ 2008-07-14 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:29:31 +0200
Sebastian Günther <samson@guenther-roetgen.de> wrote:

> * »Q« (boxcars@gmx.net) [14.07.08 01:16]:
> > A few days ago, I used eselect to switch profiles, from
> > default-linux/x86/2007.0/desktop to
> > default/linux/x86/2008.0/desktop.  
> > 
> 
> As I did...
> 
> > A lot of USE flags were removed from my make.conf, including
> > the cpu-optimizations such as sse and mmx.  After re-compiling a few
> > things and getting warnings from the ebuilds that video and audio 
> > playback would be choppy without those flags, I put them back into
> > my flags in make.conf.  If I use ufed to manage the flags, as I'm
> > used to doing, it takes them back out when I save changes.
> > 
> 
> ufed is the bad guy, I think the stable version is not able to handle 
> the new profile layout correctly.

> Use ufed-0.40-r10 from ~ and your use flags are not getting removed.

Thanks very much!  I'd thought the flags were removed /before/ I used
ufed, but I guess I was mistaken.  0.40-r10 works fine -- I should
have looked at the ufed Changelog before posting.  :)

-- 
»Q«
     Kleeneness is next to Gödelness.


--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-14 23:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-13 23:10 [gentoo-user] USE flag question »Q«
2008-07-14  6:29 ` Sebastian Günther
2008-07-14 22:50   ` [gentoo-user] Re: USE flag question [solved] »Q«

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox