From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KGcGa-00081B-CB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:11:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C98BE045F; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 16:11:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rabble.robbieab.com (rabble.robbieab.com [213.79.38.74]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16CBE045F for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 16:11:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.71] (helo=pheonix) by rabble.robbieab.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KGcGY-0000F4-FZ for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:11:38 +0100 Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 17:12:06 +0100 From: Robert Bridge To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -avC cdrkit && emerge -av cdrtools Message-ID: <20080709171206.659fa374@pheonix> In-Reply-To: <873amj2hv1.wl%jan.seeger@thenybble.de> References: <486F599D.4090606@konstantinhansen.de> <20080705195856.285861ba@loonquawl.digimed.co.uk> <486FC6F3.2010905@googlemail.com> <200807061017.19240.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <4870a0ba.ePqdoxWfTlE0tYks%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20080706190547.2c6025b0@loonquawl.digimed.co.uk> <873amj2hv1.wl%jan.seeger@thenybble.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.4.0 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 45d13084-276c-41c7-8244-8d64bd5eeb5c X-Archives-Hash: 323a6078bd306d05c830198b2e901df5 On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:32:34 +0200 "Jan Seeger" wrote: > I'd say this has gone on quite long enough. There *were* some nuggets > of information among J=F6rgs lunatic ravings, but I think it would be > best if we ended the thread. Also, who would I have to contact to get > J=F6rg removed from the list? Userrel I believe, however there are issues involved in such a move as it (currently) goes against gentoo policy. Wait for the next council meeting, where permitting such measures is being debated would be my suggestion. Rob. P.S. I intend this post purely to be a reply based on my following the -dev mailing list and hence having a vague idea of what is going before council soon. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list