Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -avC cdrkit && emerge -av cdrtools

[Sascha Hlusiak <saschahlusiak@arcor.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1641 bytes --]

Heyho,

> > Click on License. It's also in the file Copyright.txt in
> > cmake-2.4.8.tar.gz, for example.
>
> Let me quote _this_ file to verify that there is a 4 clause BSDL.
>
> The fact that cmake may have been changed a few weeks ago does not matter.
> At the time when Bloch and Co. did replace the original buildsystem by
> cmake, cmake was definitely under a 4 clause BSDL.

This is the 4th clause:

 * Modified source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must
   not be misrepresented as being the original software.

It does NOT make it the incompatible 4 clause BSDl. And I doubt that makes it 
incompatible with the GPL at all.
Please read http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_Lizenz and compare. Do you still 
hold your claim?

> If you however like to have a fruitful discussion, you should know that a
> way to disprove a claim is to verify that conclusions from the claim are
> wrong. What I did is nothing but to prove that Mr. Bloch is highly self
> contradicting.
You did not prove anything yet. You still need to prove that cdrkit is illegal 
otherwise me and others will still believe that it's just a lot of FUD from 
you. Feel free to prove us wrong.

> You need to learn that this disproves his credibility and should finally
> understand that the other claims from Mr. Bloch are the same nonsense as
> his claim with the build system.
While you still need to provide some proof of the single fact that you base 
your whole flame on, I won't believe anything. Especially I won't mistrust a 
whole person because of that. I don't have an opinion until I'm convinced. 

- Sascha

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]