From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KD658-00040K-6e for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:13:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F7C4E0465; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:13:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55713E0465 for ; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:13:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zaphod.digimed.co.uk (zaphod.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1D6D391779 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:13:15 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:13:11 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] unstable glib pulled down, but why? Message-ID: <20080630001311.23a27392@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <486806E4.2070202@gmail.com> References: <4867D6D9.5020301@gmail.com> <20080629195143.54e88d8d@loonquawl.digimed.co.uk> <4867F460.2000504@gmail.com> <20080629223608.410771c4@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <486806E4.2070202@gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0cvs1 (GTK+ 2.12.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/IxAjv+jRsD_YtsGGVxbiffG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: bd91274a-5d63-415d-87ff-3bc5081ba67d X-Archives-Hash: e4e3b5520d1fa2805197c208fe42b9a0 --Sig_/IxAjv+jRsD_YtsGGVxbiffG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:04:20 +0200, b.n. wrote: > > This is masked in a profile from the desktop-effects overlay. It's > > nothing to do with the official portage tree, but a third-party > > overlay breaking things for you. =20 > Now, what should I do? Ask to the desktop-effects guys? Seems a reasonable question. > And *why* does=20 > an overlay mask things from the *main* portage tree? Is this normal? Because masking is global, the sum of all the package.mask files is applied to the system as a whole. --=20 Neil Bothwick Few women admit their age. Few men act theirs. --Sig_/IxAjv+jRsD_YtsGGVxbiffG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkhoFwoACgkQum4al0N1GQPvLQCcDELuSp2kQdh44DYiTiu2IRu1 tYQAnjMJEmnS0LoPSDErNsOqT/wRniQ3 =XGML -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/IxAjv+jRsD_YtsGGVxbiffG-- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list