From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6T3G-0002hi-6z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:19:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1313AE0430; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:19:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (rv-out-0708.google.com [209.85.198.241]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8DA2E0430 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:19:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so3123934rvf.46 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:19:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=lUvLYszTA1REpTUdsqJ9dAjotvbd8/SxKQE/LxAN57k=; b=C3GVXf+6bZ1RE2BHEFJ0nJqTHTg1j8FzpbNB/nTwLlNwBZIVUC3zMsVPDLZ1nmGkt3 L0lcWgIqKBES0h7LH1kPSTvemSZkTbMrA4XwlFAdd0qOO7Dvgu9Fn3iR1geLTU+MqS3J WAUxSdCTeY+huR0V46Ldy8eqIr1MuDqXfrMEQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=QSeR9hYs7bORecDtYw+UvNDtPwLlUrfFa3uIF6b/CL2McdkxRbZbOdekbtYzqQLUEY EoF36PV5DY8hIyda3rnbuprG0KsHtc74qPGvQ1ibXoeZRoh57atnTGXEoDD2jmHocAYV KezdPewVsLKg8MKQiQCfCd8Mgk3OMN1gBocGs= Received: by 10.140.201.8 with SMTP id y8mr4079370rvf.148.1213201185172; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:19:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.0.3? ( [41.243.215.133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm56522yxd.2.2008.06.11.09.19.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:19:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] python-2.5 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:18:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <484F8719.7010809@j-schmitz.net> <200806111012.41267.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <5cf51b790806110609s688b027an65547a0a5bffeae7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5cf51b790806110609s688b027an65547a0a5bffeae7@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200806111818.07590.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: a07a8057-26fb-423b-878c-53ee856e0229 X-Archives-Hash: 3291880b9a1754b2c96c92ca9bf8a10a On Wednesday 11 June 2008, Sebastian Magri wrote: > Is really Portage compliant with python2.5? Yes. Works here. Think about this, if portage could not use it, it would be nowhere near the tree. > What are the reasons for > not to stabilize python2.5 at the moment? No idea. Why don't you pop over to the bugzilla, read the open bugs and find out? Then you can post back here telling us why. -- Alan McKinnon alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list