From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K3yAe-00054G-UN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:57:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 562BEE0477; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 18:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42391E0477 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 18:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D0E1118E1; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:57:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:57:04 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: TF1U34NI5Ie+wTZv3ztpCm+jde4LaaDNL3YXGofx3HCd 1212605823 Received: from NOTE_GENTOO64.PHHEIMNETZ (MOT02224.swm.uni-mannheim.de [134.155.22.119]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7220E20305 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:57:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 20:56:05 +0200 From: Florian Philipp To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Which Java Runtime is "best"? Message-ID: <20080604205605.30d9d430@NOTE_GENTOO64.PHHEIMNETZ> In-Reply-To: <20080604192410.6d8183f3@NOTE_GENTOO64.PHHEIMNETZ> References: <20080601142457.GB7742@waltdnes.org> <20080601183728.1416edad@NOTE_GENTOO64.PHHEIMNETZ> <20080604151251.3471eacd@cuci> <20080604192410.6d8183f3@NOTE_GENTOO64.PHHEIMNETZ> Organization: German Aerospace Center X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.8; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/Uel5kCLExLrMzj1.EUzDWDW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: c8fe3477-a629-4641-86c0-a0dd1159ef8c X-Archives-Hash: a41f22044d965b2e7fe5964a27231389 --Sig_/Uel5kCLExLrMzj1.EUzDWDW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 19:24:10 +0200 Florian Philipp wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:12:51 +0300 > ionut cucu wrote: >=20 > > On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 18:37:28 +0200 > > Florian Philipp wrote: > >=20 > > > On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 10:24:57 -0400 > > > "Walter Dnes" wrote: > > > Take Sun JRE. In terms of headaches per month, the quasi standard > > > implementation is unbeatable. > > Unless you have a 64 arch >=20 > I'm on AMD64 and am programming java, too. Until now I haven't had a > problem with SUN JDK (1.6). Of course, it doesn't supply a browser > plugin, but I'm not aware of any JRE doing it at the moment and thanks > to nspluginwrapper, there is no urgent need for it, either. I have to correct myself. As it seems, GNU-Classpath provides an nsplugin. I haven't tested it yet (and I won't because I need emul-linux-x86-java anyway and the current way works for me). --Sig_/Uel5kCLExLrMzj1.EUzDWDW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkhG5UoACgkQqs4uOUlOuU/8CwCeKI8PTLQujkfBjMDNt+he91JU J28AnjTDAxz9M0GNoMETZCz7ai6dZ5mZ =BKpW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Uel5kCLExLrMzj1.EUzDWDW-- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list