On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:10:30 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:

> While I agree that this might not have been the most clever
> idea "they" ever had, I would like to point your nose to
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/baselayout/baselayout-2.0.0.ebuild?r1=1.2&r2=1.3

Now it makes sense. If you have not modified conf.d/net since the last
baselayout emerge, portage considers the file to be part of the old
package and removes it. That's why only some machines are affected. It
also shows that this is not a bug with the new baselayout but a time
bomb in the 1.x ebuilds.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

No maintenance: Impossible to fix.