From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: baselayout-2.0.0 surprises
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:18:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804180318.34716.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4807BAC1.2070808@googlemail.com>
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
> > On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/baselayout/base
> >>lay out-2.0.0.ebuild?r1=1.2&r2=1.3
> >
> > oh great, changes without a rX bump. I hate that.
>
> No need for a rev bump here i guess! Anybody who runs into this will not
> benefit from a rev bump, as the files were gone and are not restored by
> the bump.
yes, need for a rev bump. If one person has a problem and another person does
not have the problem, it is helpfull to be able to determine the exact
version of the packet installed. Not bumping revs makes that harder.
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-18 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-17 14:03 [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises Helmut Jarausch
2008-04-17 13:34 ` forgottenwizard
2008-04-17 14:07 ` Neil Bothwick
2008-04-17 15:23 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2008-04-17 17:20 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2008-04-17 18:36 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2008-04-17 18:40 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2008-04-17 20:40 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2008-04-17 18:51 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2008-04-17 17:42 ` Neil Bothwick
2008-04-17 19:45 ` [gentoo-user] " Michael Schmarck
2008-04-17 19:55 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2008-04-17 20:37 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2008-04-17 21:01 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2008-04-18 1:18 ` Volker Armin Hemmann [this message]
2008-04-18 6:45 ` [gentoo-user] Versioning scheme (was: baselayout-2.0.0 surprises) Michael Schmarck
2008-04-18 1:20 ` [gentoo-user] Re: baselayout-2.0.0 surprises Volker Armin Hemmann
2008-04-17 20:34 ` Neil Bothwick
2008-04-18 8:28 ` Neil Bothwick
2008-04-18 8:10 ` [gentoo-user] " Alan McKinnon
2008-04-18 8:26 ` Roy Wright
2008-04-18 9:10 ` Graham Murray
2008-04-18 10:34 ` Neil Bothwick
2008-04-18 10:38 ` Justin
2008-04-18 11:10 ` [gentoo-user] " Michael Schmarck
2008-04-18 11:49 ` Neil Bothwick
2008-04-18 17:49 ` b.n.
2008-04-18 21:49 ` Neil Bothwick
2008-04-17 14:08 ` [gentoo-user] " Andrés Becerra Sandoval
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200804180318.34716.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de \
--to=volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox