From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jl2c4-0005eI-I6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:51:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BC5AE0655; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC14BE0655 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:51:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from loonquawl.digimed.co.uk (loonquawl.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0749D32E28F for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:51:16 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:51:05 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Question about eix-test-obsolete output Message-ID: <20080413145105.4372602e@loonquawl.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4801F65E.3070404@googlemail.com> References: <4801D431.80605@bellsouth.net> <4801DF93.6030604@googlemail.com> <4801E54E.3010202@bellsouth.net> <4801F65E.3070404@googlemail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1cvs57 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAMFBMVEX///9/OBwcKrgODnFG1FTxxqqqxpxGOBwOnA7/1dQOHBxiVH8OABwOVA4Of3G4cXD8PZSwAAAAAXRSTlMAQObYZgAAAhZJREFUOI2l082L00AUAPAcbLS7isypB4VC8w+Iubl78JDDeAj0UnC91KKIomCL2MEa6CWHQRjYgygLwi4IroQIpSCiu0KlsILOooeuW1vmT1jYHtawsDJOJh/9SHPyQUgyP+a9mZeMovxHqPU0OSimwN2fc4df3Dnzy7iWHL+NMe6xq8nKEEKC7ZvJCbZtEBsPExMMo+cDm61/CppyBtlPZDINCWymimETA0qYzqVCg4Xwe7qEGQJmezO1YR/Og+d2DNM1rtuQ2ZD0ktDDA+zD9HLvbx308eAtZH1C2McJeLrlCtg1h58JcWl1DKhBGR58Mx/+NZ9RfTlOlkVXdt+RfWTVPUS7ur40BtRhePig+cSzqC6iFcFmo3MO752ucWDpmi8xOB0VbmRq3Ltc0Lviao1BMYtKJZ9ra8sCtEshOM5G5r1oMSi2NSqgoMdQVcS/lj1auUXdCVBR4829NUUplconnVc+aEERgJwvAKBas8TpzlkJQRGEXARE5Mve17pKfQj2eIIc6sdjfpHuLMgZQZFswz1eE1EeWT+qj8S4gFUJr91DeV9ZX7e6BQmtYLlu2NDzOUr19iSEJ6aSa3JuLcV93HRXAwD5Eud8W7Q+SIGssJ3gyAfudcOtf4igIjbvy/b34P1GBBkJI3DhMHhfiCArM4kmhKtcjCEcP46+uhM9qKMRyP8ZH/dPSkq8TIPFNJgX/wBV+wZAZEipVgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/raOOsIB2pqQY0MEXdR_CDEN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 4e7fbed8-5d49-45ba-a893-7ebeae032544 X-Archives-Hash: c072392678d57fcc17ce2bd34e0d7e58 --Sig_/raOOsIB2pqQY0MEXdR_CDEN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:02:38 +0200, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > But what is the difference between a "redundant entry" and an=20 > "uninstalled entry". As far as I see the matching criteria of both=20 > checks is a package which is not installed or in the database but in a=20 > package.* file. Redundant is where the package is still available but the /etc/portage.* entry is no longer needed. e.g. you have "dev-lib/foobar-1.1 ~x86" in package.keyworkd but it is now stable. Btw: eix-test-obsolete can not check for obsolete use-flags at the > moment? flagedit will warn if you have obsolete flags in /etc/portage or /etc/make.conf. --=20 Neil Bothwick I have plenty of talent and vision. I just don't give a damn. --Sig_/raOOsIB2pqQY0MEXdR_CDEN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkgCD9QACgkQum4al0N1GQNuKACfSVHvriGdrbaVpF+57rNTsZ7F M5IAnj6M7k4ZaP9fxgmSBZ7xNaEYWWGt =5Hfk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/raOOsIB2pqQY0MEXdR_CDEN-- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list