From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JeCNJ-0000i0-0G for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:51:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6ECE0E0795; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.iway.na (smtp1.iway.na [196.44.136.15]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183E7E0795 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vscan.iway.na (vscan.iway.na [196.44.136.13]) by smtp1.iway.na (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C21C6630 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:51:16 +0200 (WAST) Received: from mx1.iway.na (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vscan.iway.na (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33B57CE1F for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:51:17 +0200 (WAST) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (unknown [41.205.140.187]) by mx1.iway.na (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B6A58EE for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:51:16 +0200 (WAST) From: Uwe Thiem Organization: SysEx (Pty) Ltd. To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] openchrome in portage Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:51:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <200803251521.44474.uwix@iway.na> <200803251624.56547.uwix@iway.na> <200803251724.26130.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200803251724.26130.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803251851.04307.uwix@iway.na> X-Archives-Salt: c2a25d34-8b21-4b1a-91fd-57bb63e82d7c X-Archives-Hash: ba10f05cd51cd32d8a2577a95fd53ee6 On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: > > > > Why on earth is it excluding openchrome? > > > > > > Because the xorg-server ebuild does not support openchrome. > > > yet. Just add openchrome to world until it does > > > > Well, didn't look into the ebuild. You are right. Now, why and > > how did it work with the overlay? > > I know nothing about that overlay, so I'm just guessing. Perhaps > the overlay had a patched xorg-server? The openchrome tarball from the overlay is identical to the one in portage. Actually, the overlay was just moved into portage I guess. Anyway, any patch in the overlay tarball must then also be in the portage one. Alright, I stop here. It's just something puzzling me - and I don't like that without understanding it. ;-) BTW, KDE4 is far smoother now. Animations are faster. Still, no shiny composite effects of KDE without crashing the whole session. Guess, I have to ask the openchrome folks whether they have any ETA for this. Another thing is that the latest MESA release is quite old. They used to have a new release every 2 - 3 months. This might be related as well. Unfortunately, they don't have any kind of roadmap on their web site. So one doesn't know when to expect a new version. Yes, I know: Get a decent video subsystem. Not that easy. The Intel chips (most probably enough for my purpose) only reside on mobos. ATI drivers are in the process of catching up and will probably be there in six or so months' time - but they aren't now. Nvidia, yes nvidia. Would rather try to avoid them. So not too many options for me short of throwing the whole mobo out. Uwe -- Informal Linux Group Namibia: http://www.linux.org.na/ SysEx (Pty) Ltd.: http://www.SysEx.com.na/ -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list