From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JeEn8-00050m-Fm for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:26:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72037E0832; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com (smtp1.hushmail.com [65.39.178.133]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D31E0832 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com (localhost.hushmail.com [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 13E591142F for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:26:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:14:51 +0000 From: forgottenwizard To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] intelfb and 945GM Message-ID: <20080325131451.GA4619@localhost> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <637767164.20080313233410@gmail.com> <20080314004912.GB28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> <743007646.20080314135448@gmail.com> <20080314162226.GC9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> <1205524221.9950.4.camel@localhost> <20080325161822.GA6280@phoenix.nasreddine.info> <1942726220.20080325184346@gmail.com> <20080325165632.GC6280@phoenix.nasreddine.info> <2710683864.20080325191125@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2710683864.20080325191125@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: cc095c0d-df31-41b7-ae70-269b123ad40c X-Archives-Hash: c6ba3eb296c8ef45ffda10590e50ca57 On 19:11 Tue 25 Mar , Sergey Kobzar wrote: > Hi Wael, > > Tuesday, March 25, 2008, 6:56:32 PM, you wrote: > > > This One Time, at Band Camp, Sergey Kobzar > > said, On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:43:46PM +0200: > >> > Did intel works for you?? how's the performance ?? What did you > >> > add/remove from your kernel ?? > >> > >> No, unfortunately it does not :(. I've switched to uvesafb. Looks like > >> I have no other choice... > > Oh :S too bad, I hoped to have a better performance with mplayer's > > fbdev output... > > That's one of the reason why I wanted intelfb, but got no luck. I'm > using uvesafb at the moment, but still hope intelfb will be fixed > soon. > I seem to have missed the start of this thread, but if you don't mind, could you give me a quick idea on what is broken within intelfb? I've been debating on switching to it, but keep seeing info on it being broken, and nothing on WHAT is broken. Thanks. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list