From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JaXsZ-0006bC-N8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:00:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DB54E026B; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:00:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dcnode-01.unlimitedmail.net (unknown [212.145.239.58]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1899E026B for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:00:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp.zz ([137.204.208.98]) (authenticated bits=0) by dcnode-01.unlimitedmail.net (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m2FF0lQ4015475 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:00:48 +0100 From: Etaoin Shrdlu To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Randomly dumb questions Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:20:01 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <3D69B4A7-2EFE-4DD3-B2E0-43A02D42EA05@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <200803151604.28756.shrdlu@unlimitedmail.org> <200803151650.51347.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200803151650.51347.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803151620.01454.shrdlu@unlimitedmail.org> X-UnlimitedMail-MailScanner-From: shrdlu@unlimitedmail.org X-Spam-Status: No X-Archives-Salt: 1498849c-8335-44b7-aecb-3927d0bda496 X-Archives-Hash: ff6c966b683a69fca15b78367536f1ce On Saturday 15 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: > OK, lets go back to step 1, and try to think it through this time. > > - a user sends a mail from account X to list Y > - same user is also subscribed to list Y from account X > - if list Y sends a copy of the mail to the user at account X, then > the user has a duplicate because by definition *he already has the > original* > - it is completely reasonable to give the list admin the option to > enable or disable this behaviour Agreed. However, Gentoo lists do send back the messages to the senders, and this is unrelated to the broken way gmail handles list messages. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list