From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZTcQ-0006AP-FM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:15:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60750E060F; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:15:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.iway.na (smtp1.iway.na [196.44.136.15]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05BEDE0603 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:15:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vscan.iway.na (vscan.iway.na [196.44.136.13]) by smtp1.iway.na (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A84A66B3 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:15:48 +0200 (WAST) Received: from mx1.iway.na (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vscan.iway.na (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D56B76E9 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:15:50 +0200 (WAST) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (unknown [41.205.138.187]) by mx1.iway.na (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618C759D9 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:15:49 +0200 (WAST) From: Uwe Thiem Organization: SysEx (Pty) Ltd. To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:15:45 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <200803112058.35642.uwix@iway.na> <200803121651.43091.uwix@iway.na> <20080312155136.2d0e7d0d@loonquawl.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20080312155136.2d0e7d0d@loonquawl.digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803121815.45387.uwix@iway.na> X-Archives-Salt: 125d4b42-dee0-4ed0-bec8-4be4eb83c258 X-Archives-Hash: 0198ac8dd9127e2710d7a7d9ac3f0191 On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:51:42 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote: > > I guess my problem is this: My video subsystem is a VIA UniChrome > > Pro IGP. I got an X driver for it from www.openchrome.org which > > doesn't seem to work properly with my "IGP" version of the > > chipset. :-( > > Which version of the driver are you using? I have an IGP chipset > and use x11-drivers/xf86-video-openchrome-0.2.901 from the Sabayon > overlay. I tried 0.2.2 from portage and an svn checkout from openchrome.org. Same result in both cases. Hm... 0.2.901 is working correctly? With composite switched on? Uwe -- Informal Linux Group Namibia: http://www.linux.org.na/ SysEx (Pty) Ltd.: http://www.SysEx.com.na/ -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list