From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYyKe-0000f5-VU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:51:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CEC0E04D7; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.187]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA98E04D7 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 18so2344963fkq.2 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:51:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=stGPpvndxtr/tH8rm25v9Ifk+MRe1gvKBTT6kbbkNfw=; b=dGkcgUjpTUpJu4CNrkfYkvU/S8Q8g1cWDCRo8oANZhjCkWRsR0Ms7dcAwrLtPhV7iMtebBSD+V+NKBPVihD03xMF0ZtMuDSfYVKhAKh0dOQyey1AgI5oEpVGDuJuNRBx1Zb6iFErogb7ILlTucetuykxWMaeo6/ed4eOmAC5nyg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=XRCDaqQBlpKwbcMxMcnzp454u0PNkIcLJEVqhfJGbE0le3QCC2os8f7hjk0l6Olm5BMdg/g2trlm82JhfEMzju4tOGXq45bTppoJxmEtBIPrhYs3Guj5BLu2eMDWJxKPb9+4FCpdcg5GKY9nmDcTc9u0WB/GZHYJLV1/2IHppDw= Received: by 10.82.112.3 with SMTP id k3mr3180274buc.32.1205218285426; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:51:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lappy.study ( [212.159.46.48]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z37sm1933696ikz.1.2008.03.10.23.51.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:51:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Bizarre SSH connection reset Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:49:09 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080309080351.6kdf31qb4s08gggw@webmail.collinstarkweather.com> <200803102251.44347.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <20080310192439.75cb71a1@pascal.spore.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <20080310192439.75cb71a1@pascal.spore.ath.cx> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1343659.uFPCEz1P0i"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200803110649.24883.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: b5283999-6b41-4ba1-b552-357a069faadb X-Archives-Hash: 5455d56f71cc67880d7a8367f2f34429 --nextPart1343659.uFPCEz1P0i Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Dan Farrell wrote: > On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:51:42 +0000 > > Mick wrote: > > On Monday 10 March 2008, Dan Farrell wrote: > > > On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:43:55 -0400 > > > > > > Mike Edenfield wrote: > > > > Comcast? > > > > > > I was on comcast for a long time (2.5 yrs) and never had a problem > > > like this. They might have blocked port 25 and squelched my > > > bittorrenting at times, but never anything like this. Of course, > > > ymmv. > > > > IIRC they also block port 80 for sure on their retail accounts. They > > don't want the average punter to run a webserver at home. > > Even when they blocked port 25 for me bidirectionally (evidently > sending 6 gigs through that port made me look like a spammer, even if > it was all to the same address ;) ), and I called security assurance > and they listed that among all the open ports I wasn't allowed on a > residential account, even then, they still didn't block port 80 (or 26, > 22, 21, 110, 993, or any other port!). Hmm, I don't know . . . The particular address I was trying to connect was= =20 definitely blocked. Other than not beeing able to connect with a browser,= =20 nc, httping and tcptraceroute confirmed it). Could it be an area/account=20 specific block perhaps? When I questioned the owner he said that this was= =20 common practice and that his ISP does not allow webservers to run. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1343659.uFPCEz1P0i Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBH1it05Fp0QerLYPcRAtBcAKDOGmhcZVbFg6ZzFI11d9nIwLDFuACfeQUq Ghf0YFr67DE3aXmsFI2OiOI= =GcW3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1343659.uFPCEz1P0i-- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list