From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYsIM-0001nn-97 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:24:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9B35E03C9; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spore.ath.cx (66-191-143-114.static.roch.mn.charter.com [66.191.143.114]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B022DE03C9 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pascal.spore.ath.cx (pascal.spore.ath.cx [192.168.1.100]) by spore.ath.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8186E1325 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:24:39 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:24:39 -0500 From: Dan Farrell To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Bizarre SSH connection reset Message-ID: <20080310192439.75cb71a1@pascal.spore.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <200803102251.44347.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> References: <20080309080351.6kdf31qb4s08gggw@webmail.collinstarkweather.com> <47D58F7B.3070905@kutulu.org> <20080310150609.35eb4af6@pascal.spore.ath.cx> <200803102251.44347.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Organization: Spore, Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: efa5cd25-bf0e-4d74-91d4-ad02c5bc7180 X-Archives-Hash: 0ca55e586890bd1da62cc9dced1c8550 On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:51:42 +0000 Mick wrote: > On Monday 10 March 2008, Dan Farrell wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:43:55 -0400 > > > > Mike Edenfield wrote: > > > Comcast? > > > > I was on comcast for a long time (2.5 yrs) and never had a problem > > like this. They might have blocked port 25 and squelched my > > bittorrenting at times, but never anything like this. Of course, > > ymmv. > > IIRC they also block port 80 for sure on their retail accounts. They > don't want the average punter to run a webserver at home. Even when they blocked port 25 for me bidirectionally (evidently sending 6 gigs through that port made me look like a spammer, even if it was all to the same address ;) ), and I called security assurance and they listed that among all the open ports I wasn't allowed on a residential account, even then, they still didn't block port 80 (or 26, 22, 21, 110, 993, or any other port!). -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list