From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JUqnY-0001Pk-N4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:00:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6EC29E0801; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E5EE0806 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so487041ugf.49 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:00:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0H/5sGwN2QQCe0aOstnuWlxf8UTl4reEu4VhS3OTIgE=; b=UB8V3Yj1GIO5iQOLaYq+CXhUdUlUkHXyyMPLz9V+qPYWjsgdO0MukvCNzD8IrHgOui43C8HjMuhbtD5TnmPyiSCyrXC8g2v3IM+k1DHcOQSHOMtLyNVVoDefb5ddPLtqZVt2kl0g1wrFKiI+2u59nrldDT2BAOtF/wznwGC88KY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=T4K0ZaGCErpHAVK5CH8p/9O2hy/3uFgOSvdoGOcQEimZ6jE3bRiwwC/Rz33dtuLJbdhAN6fdlyrPqXrZg3DdS0qnfbfD41j5rfrXN5d+vA0ExH4sYCtIh/3SHq2an5AKOWDNylRfRv2wCVoOZyqhB/WnXlb6RzwgHDQszxsZwVw= Received: by 10.67.122.12 with SMTP id z12mr495179ugm.18.1204236013067; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:00:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuci ( [141.85.0.71]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b39sm2034012ugf.27.2008.02.28.14.00.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:00:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:58:32 +0200 From: ionut cucu To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] sshfs issue Message-ID: <20080228235832.55afd551@cuci> In-Reply-To: <200802281651.59576.mcbrides9@comcast.net> References: <20080228231922.39a338a7@cuci> <200802281651.59576.mcbrides9@comcast.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.8; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: fe55b8d8-089e-4afe-9061-a9fee33e93e4 X-Archives-Hash: f61598abd05a54c57041dc5bb4ac9583 On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:51:59 -0500 Jerry McBride wrote: > On Thursday 28 February 2008 04:19:22 pm ionut cucu wrote: > > I'm running sshfs very often and I've noticed the following issue: > > whenever the hub/swich(what ever is that keeping my lan together) > > suddenly stops working while I'm using sshfs my computer crashes, > > or if I;m lucky enough I get to do an umount before everything > > falls. Is there any way to prevent this? > > Also since this is a lan is there a null encryption algorithm I > > could use to speed things up a bit? Or lower the CPU usage? > > Thanks! > > Dude... time for a new switch... > Yeah well it's a campus *(1) switch, the campus's *(2) lan, the campus's *(3) gateway....so on so forth till the A class IP so I can do nothing about it Note *(1) to *(2) are ugly words and shouldn't be used around children -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list