From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JUrST-0006bl-2l for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:42:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFD38E0078; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from QMTA07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.64]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0000E0078 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from OMTA07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.59]) by QMTA07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id v2ZR1Y0051GhbT8570cg00; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:41:59 +0000 Received: from spinner ([76.116.4.141]) by OMTA07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id vAiV1Y00B32Z8is3T00000; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:42:29 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=FP58Ms26AAAA:8 a=XKBHSGjMDxUze97wp_UA:9 a=NnJys-vFHGPNy_owifQA:7 a=nYR4ZKNshJtZGkT7ebMuALLzCTMA:4 a=si9q_4b84H0A:10 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 From: Jerry McBride Organization: TEAM-LINUX To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] sshfs issue Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:42:23 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <20080228231922.39a338a7@cuci> <200802281651.59576.mcbrides9@comcast.net> <20080228235832.55afd551@cuci> In-Reply-To: <20080228235832.55afd551@cuci> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802281742.23522.mcbrides9@comcast.net> X-Archives-Salt: 3e9421a4-893c-43a2-8850-496bca9dd34a X-Archives-Hash: f22e7e63429756ad4020af87b0eaf13f On Thursday 28 February 2008 04:58:32 pm ionut cucu wrote: > On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:51:59 -0500 > > Jerry McBride wrote: > > On Thursday 28 February 2008 04:19:22 pm ionut cucu wrote: > > > I'm running sshfs very often and I've noticed the following issue: > > > whenever the hub/swich(what ever is that keeping my lan together) > > > suddenly stops working while I'm using sshfs my computer crashes, > > > or if I;m lucky enough I get to do an umount before everything > > > falls. Is there any way to prevent this? > > > Also since this is a lan is there a null encryption algorithm I > > > could use to speed things up a bit? Or lower the CPU usage? > > > Thanks! > > > > Dude... time for a new switch... > > Yeah well it's a campus *(1) switch, the campus's *(2) lan, the > campus's *(3) gateway....so on so forth till the A class IP so I can do > nothing about it > > Note *(1) to *(2) are ugly words and shouldn't be used around children Hmmm no help.... How about this? http://fuse.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/SshfsFaq Has a section concerning "locking up"... Also... how about reporting a bug to the developer? Send bug reports to fuse-sshfs@lists.sourceforge.net.=20 I just glossed over the documentation and saw no mention of a null encrypti= on=20 engine. If you are willing to use no encryption... maybe you should try=20 another transport protocol... NFS works well. Also sshfs runs via the FUSE architecture.... Not well know for performance= ,=20 more for "as a means to an end" and it runs slow too. Cheers. =2D-=20 =46rom the Desk of: Jerome D. McBride -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list