From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JUqff-0000uB-Po for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:52:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C64AE05E9; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from QMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.24]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9253E05E9 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from OMTA08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.12]) by QMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id v7ix1Y0030Fqzac5207u00; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:51:35 +0000 Received: from spinner ([76.116.4.141]) by OMTA08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id v9s51Y00A32Z8is3U00000; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:52:05 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=YqBwZqXJsFtdnh1EfmMA:9 a=kOMBLwKslIpBguC6WfJCgv5-O2gA:4 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 From: Jerry McBride Organization: TEAM-LINUX To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] sshfs issue Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:51:59 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <20080228231922.39a338a7@cuci> In-Reply-To: <20080228231922.39a338a7@cuci> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802281651.59576.mcbrides9@comcast.net> X-Archives-Salt: 9bae6a33-a07a-4e58-bfaf-bb19cb0fc692 X-Archives-Hash: 788bd603f836c6b559ab40b8f463f057 On Thursday 28 February 2008 04:19:22 pm ionut cucu wrote: > I'm running sshfs very often and I've noticed the following issue: > whenever the hub/swich(what ever is that keeping my lan together) > suddenly stops working while I'm using sshfs my computer crashes, or if > I;m lucky enough I get to do an umount before everything falls. Is > there any way to prevent this? > Also since this is a lan is there a null encryption algorithm I could > use to speed things up a bit? Or lower the CPU usage? > Thanks! Dude... time for a new switch... =2D-=20 =46rom the Desk of: Jerome D. McBride -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list