From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JKAMW-0006ur-M0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:40:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1352E0837; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:40:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de (hirsch.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.6]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F046E0837 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:40:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Envelope-From: ralf@ark.in-berlin.de X-Envelope-To: Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hirsch.in-berlin.de (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2) with ESMTP id m0UAe9Zs015803 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:40:09 +0100 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by hirsch.in-berlin.de (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with UUCP id m0UAe9SO015802 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:40:09 +0100 Received: by ark.in-berlin.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3EAC311BC92; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:18:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:18:29 +0100 From: Ralf Stephan To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] paludis vs emerge Message-ID: <20080130101829.GB18825@ark.in-berlin.de> References: <20080125193055.7000962d@osage.osagesoftware.com> <20080125164517.30437748@xenon> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080125164517.30437748@xenon> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: 6ad14de5-9df5-4353-a0e8-9e1e7d109e9f X-Archives-Hash: 27b1d182d86e41ccb080e63aaeb10bd1 > > Have I overlooked an option comparable to "--ask" ? > > > No, Paludis is non-interactive. With 700 packages, paludis takes quite long here to give output, and having that double is irritating. Would it be possible to cache computations such that the second time (without -p) at least would be faster? Regards, ralf -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list