From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JJA5e-0000vN-GJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:10:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B128DE0458; Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.20]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885C5E0458 for ; Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id A5771207B35 for ; Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:10:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1ED207B12 for ; Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:10:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de (account wevah [139.174.197.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.14) with ESMTPSA id 29856890 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:10:35 +0100 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Speed up with pbzip2 or not!? Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 13:54:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <479C55D6.70406@j-schmitz.net> <1201428996.13657.6.camel@NOTE_GENTOO64.PHHEIMNETZ> <479C5EFD.6090500@j-schmitz.net> In-Reply-To: <479C5EFD.6090500@j-schmitz.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801271354.45737.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V5.3 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: 7f0f833e-bad8-4dcf-95a7-4ecc2bd41506 X-Archives-Hash: b9fec787b06f5034a9d28a1717764eae On Sonntag, 27. Januar 2008, Justin wrote: > Thats a good point. Now it worked really fast. > But then the questions is why should I use pbzip2 for decompression with > portage? I think most tarballs are packed only with the normal > compression algorithm! > The WIKI articel pretends a gain of speed which wont be! and that is why you should never trust wiki-articles. Everybody can write them and say whatever they want. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list