From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ?
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:48:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200801231948.00434.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080123173559.GC16632@nibiru.local>
On Mittwoch, 23. Januar 2008, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * reader@newsguy.com <reader@newsguy.com> wrote:
> > I'd hazard a guess that you may have hit a bigger problem than your
> > comment indicates. I'm pretty sure there would be great pressure to
> > use `quick and dirty hacks' to get stuff done when devs are nearly
> > always overworked.
>
> Actually, they IMHO *are*. Look at the large amount of patches in the
> tree and the uncountable discussions which are not gentoo specific.
> And the same happens also in other distros. An really large amount
> of work could be done easily outside specific distros, but in an
> more general way.
>
> But as long as the devs refuse cooperation with such distro-agnostic
> (meta-)projects like OSS-QM, there aren't much changes for it
> becoming better ;-P
so your ranting is nothing but pushing your little pet project?
Distro devs are working together already. When they discuss stuff on the
upstream mls and send their patches there.
Oh, and have you ever recognized, that a lot of gentoo patches come from other
distros? No?
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-23 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-12 9:11 [gentoo-user] Daniel Robbins' come back ? alain.didierjean
2008-01-12 10:31 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-12 12:08 ` Jil Larner
2008-01-12 12:55 ` Mick
2008-01-12 13:34 ` Dale
2008-01-12 17:07 ` Richard Marzan
2008-01-12 17:22 ` Renat Golubchyk
2008-01-12 17:49 ` Hal Martin
2008-01-12 18:13 ` Richard Marzan
2008-01-12 21:17 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2008-01-13 14:07 ` Eddie Mihalow Jr
2008-01-13 14:23 ` Naga Toro
2008-01-13 14:33 ` Eddie Mihalow Jr
2008-01-13 15:06 ` Naga Toro
2008-01-13 16:31 ` Eddie Mihalow Jr
2008-01-13 17:37 ` Naga Toro
2008-01-14 5:42 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-14 11:43 ` Galevsky
2008-01-14 11:19 ` Eddie Mihalow Jr
2008-01-13 16:45 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2008-01-13 22:39 ` Dale
2008-01-14 6:54 ` [gentoo-user] " reader
2008-01-14 7:28 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-14 7:41 ` Dale
2008-01-14 7:51 ` Naga
2008-01-14 8:10 ` Dale
2008-01-14 16:18 ` James
2008-01-14 11:16 ` [gentoo-user] " Eddie Mihalow Jr
2008-01-19 15:37 ` [gentoo-user] Quo vadis Gentoo [WAS: Daniel Robbins' come back ?] Enrico Weigelt
2008-01-19 19:55 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2008-01-16 4:58 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ? »Q«
2008-01-13 14:48 ` Michael Schmarck
2008-01-12 20:03 ` Michael Schmarck
2008-01-12 21:16 ` [gentoo-user] " Hemmann, Volker Armin
2008-01-13 9:10 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-12 17:11 ` Δημήτριος Ροπόκης
2008-01-19 12:45 ` Enrico Weigelt
2008-01-20 0:40 ` [gentoo-user] " reader
2008-01-23 17:35 ` Enrico Weigelt
2008-01-23 18:48 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin [this message]
2008-01-12 22:06 ` James
2008-01-13 0:03 ` Dale
2008-01-13 4:08 ` James
2008-01-13 7:56 ` Mark Kirkwood
2008-01-13 9:31 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-14 2:52 ` Iain Buchanan
2008-01-13 9:58 ` Uwe Thiem
2008-01-13 9:29 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-12 19:19 ` [gentoo-user] " fire-eyes
2008-01-13 9:37 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-13 10:05 ` Alan E. Davis
2008-01-14 8:47 ` [gentoo-user] " Thufir
2008-01-13 10:06 ` [gentoo-user] " Uwe Thiem
2008-01-13 10:18 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-13 1:12 ` [gentoo-user] " James
2008-01-13 10:41 ` Mick
2008-01-13 14:51 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-14 1:19 ` James
2008-01-14 5:35 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-14 6:04 ` Iain Buchanan
2008-01-14 12:31 ` Mick
2008-01-14 10:26 ` Thufir
2008-01-14 16:51 ` James
2008-01-14 18:11 ` Etaoin Shrdlu
2008-01-14 18:30 ` Jil Larner
2008-01-14 19:47 ` James
2008-01-14 20:40 ` reader
2008-01-14 21:13 ` Jil Larner
2008-01-14 21:03 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-15 5:22 ` reader
2008-01-15 5:42 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-15 7:26 ` Iain Buchanan
2008-01-15 7:57 ` Mick
2008-01-14 21:51 ` Jil Larner
2008-01-15 0:31 ` Iain Buchanan
2008-01-14 19:15 ` James
2008-01-14 20:43 ` [gentoo-user] Re: License issues [was:Daniel Robbins' come back ?] Etaoin Shrdlu
2008-01-14 21:33 ` James
2008-01-14 22:16 ` Etaoin Shrdlu
2008-01-15 11:39 ` Michael Schmarck
2008-01-14 21:16 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ? Alan McKinnon
2008-01-15 1:36 ` James
2008-01-15 11:34 ` Michael Schmarck
2008-01-15 11:31 ` Michael Schmarck
2008-01-17 6:37 ` Thufir
2008-01-19 14:55 ` [gentoo-user] Quo vadis Gentoo [WAS: Daniel Robbins' come back ?] Enrico Weigelt
2008-01-14 10:30 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ? Thufir
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200801231948.00434.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de \
--to=volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox