From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JH6K3-0003t2-1k for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:44:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC694E06BC; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:44:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.21]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BE8E06BC for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:44:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 047BB2087C7 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:44:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94A52087BF for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:44:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de (account wevah [139.174.197.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.14) with ESMTPSA id 29655481 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:44:55 +0100 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] RAM upgrade, kernel and swap Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:44:53 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080121134214.66ee32ef@lbg2.evolone.org> In-Reply-To: <20080121134214.66ee32ef@lbg2.evolone.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801220044.54096.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V5.3 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: e2714096-7756-475c-ae24-1385657b9393 X-Archives-Hash: 1324ac567e9bf8822f85197d69aad91e On Montag, 21. Januar 2008, Michael Higgins wrote: > So, I just got 2 GB of RAM in the mail. Whoo hoo. > > Before I pop these in, soliciting any thoughts about the following: > > zcat /proc/config.gz |grep MEM > CONFIG_SHMEM=y > # CONFIG_TINY_SHMEM is not set > # CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set > CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y > # CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set > CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y > CONFIG_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL=y > CONFIG_FLATMEM_MANUAL=y > # CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM_MANUAL is not set > # CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_MANUAL is not set > CONFIG_FLATMEM=y > CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP=y > # CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_STATIC is not set > CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=y > # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UMEM is not set > # CONFIG_INPUT_FF_MEMLESS is not set > # CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM is not set > CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM=y > > > Name Flags Part Type FS Type [Label] > Size (MB) > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >--- hda1 Boot Primary Linux ext2 > 256.50 hda2 Primary Linux swap / > Solaris 1024.46 hda3 Primary Linux > ext3 21480.44 hda5 Logical > Linux ReiserFS 28771.84 hda6 > Logical Linux ReiserFS 28493.15 > > IOW, do I need to/should I recompile my kernel or change partition > sizes? if you don't plan to try suspend-to-disk. No even if you plan to try suspend-to-disk it might work with a swapfile. So still no. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list