[gentoo-user] No ebuild for kdeartwork-colorschemes ??

[gentoo-user] No ebuild for kdeartwork-colorschemes ??

[Alan McKinnon]

Hi all,

My portage-fu is apparently up the creek. Again.

Trying to emerge kde-4.0.0, I get this:

==================
nazgul ~ # emerge -av kde-meta

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies | *
 * ERROR: kde-base/kdeartwork-colorschemes-4.0.0 failed.
 * Call stack:
 *                              ebuild.sh, line 1666:  Called 
source '/var/portage/kde-base/kdeartwork-colorschemes/kdeartwork-colorschemes-4.0.0.ebuild'
 *   kdeartwork-colorschemes-4.0.0.ebuild, line    9:  Called 
inherit 'kde4-meta'
 *                              ebuild.sh, line 1192:  Called 
qa_source '/var/portage/local/layman/kde/eclass/kde4-meta.eclass'
 *                              ebuild.sh, line   36:  Called 
source '/var/portage/local/layman/kde/eclass/kde4-meta.eclass'
 *                       kde4-meta.eclass, line   39:  Called 
get-parent-package 'kde-base/kdeartwork-colorschemes'
 *                  kde4-functions.eclass, line  330:  Called die
 * The specific snippet of code:
 *      die "Package $target not found in KDE_DERIVATION_MAP, please 
report bug"
 *  The die message:
 *   Package  not found in KDE_DERIVATION_MAP, please report bug
 *
 * If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack 
if relevant.
 *

emerge: there are no ebuilds to 
satisfy ">=kde-base/kdeartwork-colorschemes-4.0.0:kde-4".
(dependency required by "kde-base/kdeartwork-meta-4.0.0" [ebuild])
=================

But the ebuild is there:

=================
nazgul portage # eix kdeartwork-colorschemes
* kde-base/kdeartwork-colorschemes
     Available versions:  (kde-4)  {M}(~)4.0.0
     Homepage:            http://www.kde.org/
     Description:         KDE extra colorschemes
=================

And it's also keyworded and unmasked:

=================
nazgul portage # grep -r kdeartwork-colorschemes /etc/portage/*
/etc/portage/package.keywords/kde4:kde-base/kdeartwork-colorschemes     
**
/etc/portage/package.unmask/kde4:>=kde-base/kdeartwork-colorschemes-4.0.0
=================

I don't want to submit a bug as per the error just yet as I'm sure I'm 
doing something wrong on my end (as usual).

But what?

alan

-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] No ebuild for kdeartwork-colorschemes ??

[Uwe Thiem]

On 20 January 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My portage-fu is apparently up the creek. Again.
>
> Trying to emerge kde-4.0.0, I get this:
>
> ==================
> nazgul ~ # emerge -av kde-meta
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies | *
>  * ERROR: kde-base/kdeartwork-colorschemes-4.0.0 failed.
>  * Call stack:
>  *                              ebuild.sh, line 1666:  Called
> source
> '/var/portage/kde-base/kdeartwork-colorschemes/kdeartwork-colorschemes-4.0.
>0.ebuild' *   kdeartwork-colorschemes-4.0.0.ebuild, line    9:  Called
> inherit 'kde4-meta'
>  *                              ebuild.sh, line 1192:  Called
> qa_source '/var/portage/local/layman/kde/eclass/kde4-meta.eclass'
>  *                              ebuild.sh, line   36:  Called
> source '/var/portage/local/layman/kde/eclass/kde4-meta.eclass'
>  *                       kde4-meta.eclass, line   39:  Called
> get-parent-package 'kde-base/kdeartwork-colorschemes'
>  *                  kde4-functions.eclass, line  330:  Called die
>  * The specific snippet of code:
>  *      die "Package $target not found in KDE_DERIVATION_MAP, please
> report bug"
>  *  The die message:
>  *   Package  not found in KDE_DERIVATION_MAP, please report bug
>  *
>  * If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack
> if relevant.
>  *
>
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to
> satisfy ">=kde-base/kdeartwork-colorschemes-4.0.0:kde-4".
> (dependency required by "kde-base/kdeartwork-meta-4.0.0" [ebuild])
> =================
>
> But the ebuild is there:
>
> =================
> nazgul portage # eix kdeartwork-colorschemes
> * kde-base/kdeartwork-colorschemes
>      Available versions:  (kde-4)  {M}(~)4.0.0
>      Homepage:            http://www.kde.org/
>      Description:         KDE extra colorschemes
> =================
>
> And it's also keyworded and unmasked:
>
> =================
> nazgul portage # grep -r kdeartwork-colorschemes /etc/portage/*
> /etc/portage/package.keywords/kde4:kde-base/kdeartwork-colorschemes
> **
> /etc/portage/package.unmask/kde4:>=kde-base/kdeartwork-colorschemes-4.0.0
> =================
>
> I don't want to submit a bug as per the error just yet as I'm sure I'm
> doing something wrong on my end (as usual).

I just finished emerging KDE4 and are running revdep-rebuild now. I didn't get 
that error. That's no consolation, I know, but I guess something must be 
wrong on your side.  Is the kdeartwork tarball actually in distfiles?

Uwe

-- 
If a man speaks in a forest, and no woman listens to him,
is he still lying?
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] No ebuild for kdeartwork-colorschemes ??

[Alan McKinnon]

On Sunday 20 January 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> On 20 January 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > My portage-fu is apparently up the creek. Again.
> >
> > Trying to emerge kde-4.0.0, I get this:
> >
> > ==================
> > nazgul ~ # emerge -av kde-meta
> >
> > These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> >
> > Calculating dependencies | *
> >  * ERROR: kde-base/kdeartwork-colorschemes-4.0.0 failed.

[snip]

> I just finished emerging KDE4 and are running revdep-rebuild now. I
> didn't get that error. That's no consolation, I know, but I guess
> something must be wrong on your side.  Is the kdeartwork tarball
> actually in distfiles?

No, it doesn't even get that far. This happens at the beginning when 
portage is still calculating the dependencies. Portage is up to date 
and a sync this morning didn't change the error either.

alan


-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] SOLVED No ebuild for kdeartwork-colorschemes ??

[Alan McKinnon]

On Sunday 20 January 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> On 20 January 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > My portage-fu is apparently up the creek. Again.
> >
> > Trying to emerge kde-4.0.0, I get this:
> >
> > ==================
> > nazgul ~ # emerge -av kde-meta
> >
> > These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> >
> > Calculating dependencies | *
> >  * ERROR: kde-base/kdeartwork-colorschemes-4.0.0 failed.
> >  * Call stack:

Solved.

I had the kde overlay in git enabled. Dependencies are now calculated 
properly when the overlay is disabled.

alan


-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] SOLVED No ebuild for kdeartwork-colorschemes ??

[Uwe Thiem]

On 20 January 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 20 January 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> > On 20 January 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > My portage-fu is apparently up the creek. Again.
> > >
> > > Trying to emerge kde-4.0.0, I get this:
> > >
> > > ==================
> > > nazgul ~ # emerge -av kde-meta
> > >
> > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> > >
> > > Calculating dependencies | *
> > >  * ERROR: kde-base/kdeartwork-colorschemes-4.0.0 failed.
> > >  * Call stack:
>
> Solved.
>
> I had the kde overlay in git enabled. Dependencies are now calculated
> properly when the overlay is disabled.

Uh-huh! Yes, that explains it. Good luck there in building 4.0.0.

If I could make konsole of 4.0.0 not to crash on startup and kmail from 3.5.8 
to start at all in 4.0.0, I would immediately make 4.0.0 my default desktop. 
Without these two apps, I can not. :-(

Uwe

-- 
If a man speaks in a forest, and no woman listens to him,
is he still lying?
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] SOLVED No ebuild for kdeartwork-colorschemes ??

[Alan McKinnon]

On Sunday 20 January 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote:

> > Solved.
> >
> > I had the kde overlay in git enabled. Dependencies are now
> > calculated properly when the overlay is disabled.
>
> Uh-huh! Yes, that explains it. Good luck there in building 4.0.0.

Currently on package 158 of 190, it's now 22:31 and the emerge started 
at 18:22. I seem to remember building 3.5.x from scratch progressed a 
whole lot slower. Maybe this need build system for kde4 really is a 
whole lot faster and easier.

My girlfriend says the build output looks pretty :-O

> If I could make konsole of 4.0.0 not to crash on startup and kmail
> from 3.5.8 to start at all in 4.0.0, I would immediately make 4.0.0
> my default desktop. Without these two apps, I can not. :-(

Hmmm, konsole and kmail not running doesn't fill me with joy. This are 
probably the apps I use the most followed by konqueror, kopete and 
amarok :-(


-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] SOLVED No ebuild for kdeartwork-colorschemes ??

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 383 bytes --]

On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:40:40 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote:

> If I could make konsole of 4.0.0 not to crash on startup and kmail from
> 3.5.8 to start at all in 4.0.0, I would immediately make 4.0.0 my
> default desktop. Without these two apps, I can not. :-(

Yakuake works, but claws-mail doesn't, so I'm back on 3.5 for now.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

WinErr 002: No Error - Yet

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] SOLVED No ebuild for kdeartwork-colorschemes ??

[Eddie Mihalow Jr]

Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 20 January 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> 
>>> Solved.
>>>
>>> I had the kde overlay in git enabled. Dependencies are now
>>> calculated properly when the overlay is disabled.
>> Uh-huh! Yes, that explains it. Good luck there in building 4.0.0.
> 
> Currently on package 158 of 190, it's now 22:31 and the emerge started 
> at 18:22. I seem to remember building 3.5.x from scratch progressed a 
> whole lot slower. Maybe this need build system for kde4 really is a 
> whole lot faster and easier.
> 
> My girlfriend says the build output looks pretty :-O
> 
>> If I could make konsole of 4.0.0 not to crash on startup and kmail
>> from 3.5.8 to start at all in 4.0.0, I would immediately make 4.0.0
>> my default desktop. Without these two apps, I can not. :-(
> 
> Hmmm, konsole and kmail not running doesn't fill me with joy. This are 
> probably the apps I use the most followed by konqueror, kopete and 
> amarok :-(
> 
> 
The cmake system does seem to go a lot faster than the old way. Is anyone
on the list using kde4-svn? I'm using it on 2 machines-1 laptop and 1 
desktop.
I keep losing the taskbar on the desktop, but not on the laptop.

Thanks,

-- 
Edward A Mihalow Jr
Mudbug Computers and Networks
Gentoo! Linux
Registered Linux User#225662
New Orleans,LA
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] SOLVED No ebuild for kdeartwork-colorschemes ??

[ionut cucu]

On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:05:50 +0000
Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:

>
> 
> Yakuake works, but claws-mail doesn't, so I'm back on 3.5 for now.
> 
> 
I've got KDE-4 from the svn/git overlay on 2 desktop machines and I
must say it's pretty stable. I must say now kde brought me back from
fluxbox. I'm still on claws-mail-3.0 and it works on my kde, it even
followed the kde's color schemes. The only thing I'm inpacient about
now is koepte using buddy pictures instead of it's default icons. Kmail
alsao starts with no issues but I still like claws mail better.
{FLAME WAR: gnome better come up with a good reply to this kde version}

-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] SOLVED No ebuild for kdeartwork-colorschemes ??

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 297 bytes --]

On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:07:17 +0200, ionut cucu wrote:

> I'm still on claws-mail-3.0 and it works on my kde,

If I move the .claws-mail directory, it start fine, so it must be
something in my settings that KDE 4.0 objects to.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Engineers do it with less resistance.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]