From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFenR-0000tb-8W for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:09:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A89C5E0AE0; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC176E0AD7 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from loonquawl.digimed.co.uk (loonquawl.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B628F2E6542 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:08:57 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:08:51 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Once again baffled by portage Message-ID: <20080118000851.4c06eefa@loonquawl.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <200801180041.12159.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> References: <200801171806.28565.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <200801180041.12159.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0cvs46 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Face: 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 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/zCXvzD7QP.8=3UozRK5nzX2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: e27ed363-cc48-41fb-9956-3fddefbb9394 X-Archives-Hash: 74c92bb60f32cd83726dc4c60661b4f2 --Sig_/zCXvzD7QP.8=3UozRK5nzX2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:41:04 +0100, Bo =D8rsted Andresen wrote: > Actually it was decided to keep monolithics in KDE 4.0.0. Splits are > now the default which means they are listed first in any-of dependency > blocks such as e.g. || ( kde-base/kompare:kde-4 kde-base/kdesdk:kde-4 ) > in KDE 4. But monos are still around. There is a list of the monos in > the url I posted in another mail to this thread. Would it be possible to modify the kde-meta eclass so that a split vs monolithic block gave a more informative error message. Even a generic message pointing to that URI would be a great help. --=20 Neil Bothwick Daisy Duke shorts would never go out of fashion. --Sig_/zCXvzD7QP.8=3UozRK5nzX2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHj+4Yum4al0N1GQMRAucxAKCjno/rJUC2YQluNANWLtzkG09A7wCfUK25 QXeDXz+WDDdAaXKzhWnJt2s= =GyHa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/zCXvzD7QP.8=3UozRK5nzX2-- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list